328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 850561)
1. The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section.
Hughey MJ; LaPata RE; McElin TW; Lussky R
Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 850561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
Gilstrap LC; Hauth JC; Toussaint S
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Indications for cesarean section].
Stoll W
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1990 Feb; 120(8):255-9. PubMed ID: 2408143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.
Anderson GM; Lomas J
N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(14):887-92. PubMed ID: 6472401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?
Anderson GM; Lomas J
Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Feb; 132(3):253-6, 259. PubMed ID: 3967160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changing indications for cesarean section. A 38-year experience at a community hospital.
Haddad H; Lundy LE
Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Feb; 51(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 622222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Lee WK; Baggish MS
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 1264397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing primary cesarean section patterns at a private hospital.
Farb HF
J Reprod Med; 1980 Dec; 25(6):298-303. PubMed ID: 7205796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.
Baskett TF; McMillen RM
Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):723-6. PubMed ID: 7326654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
Soliman SR; Burrows RF
CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Incidence of and factors associated with primary cesarean section in Benin (Africa)].
Fourn L; Alihonou E; Seguin L; Ducic S
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8134665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation.
Ismail MA; Nagib N; Ismail T; Cibils LA
J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(5):339-51. PubMed ID: 10642954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
