238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8505715)
21. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with vertebral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.
Laval-Jeantet AM; Bergot C; Williams M; Davidson K; Laval-Jeantet M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Jan; 56(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 7796340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro.
Ebbesen EN; Thomsen JS; Beck-Nielsen H; Nepper-Rasmussen HJ; Mosekilde L
Bone; 1998 Sep; 23(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 9737351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of osteoporosis: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the radius and lumbar spine.
Takada M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Grampp S; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Genant HK
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):759-63. PubMed ID: 9051031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT.
Guglielmi G; Grimston SK; Fischer KC; Pacifici R
Radiology; 1994 Sep; 192(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 8058958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects.
Van Berkum FN; Birkenhäger JC; Van Veen LC; Zeelenberg J; Birkenhäger-Frenkel DH; Trouerbach WT; Stijnen T; Pols HA
J Bone Miner Res; 1989 Oct; 4(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 2816513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lactose intolerance: a risk factor for reduced bone mineral density and vertebral fractures?
Kudlacek S; Freudenthaler O; Weissböeck H; Schneider B; Willvonseder R
J Gastroenterol; 2002; 37(12):1014-9. PubMed ID: 12522532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spinal and femoral DXA for the assessment of spinal osteoporosis.
Jergas M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Nov; 61(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 9351874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [A comparison between quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy densitometry in the study of patients at risk for postmenopausal osteoporosis].
La Fianza A; Campani R; Dore R; Torretta L; Bertoni G
Radiol Med; 1992; 84(1-2):11-4. PubMed ID: 1509125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: preliminary results using a novel lumbar spine phantom-based MRI scoring method.
Din RU; Nishtar T; Cheng X; Yang H
Radiol Med; 2024 Jun; 129(6):912-924. PubMed ID: 38625420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ankylosing spondylitis and bone mineral density--what is the ideal tool for measurement?
Lange U; Kluge A; Strunk J; Teichmann J; Bachmann G
Rheumatol Int; 2005 Dec; 26(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15538574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 3-D Subject-Specific Shape and Density Estimation of the Lumbar Spine From a Single Anteroposterior DXA Image Including Assessment of Cortical and Trabecular Bone.
Lopez Picazo M; Magallon Baro A; Del Rio Barquero LM; Di Gregorio S; Martelli Y; Romera J; Steghofer M; Gonzalez Ballester MA; Humbert L
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Dec; 37(12):2651-2662. PubMed ID: 29994113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Use of imaging procedures in the diagnostics of osteoporosis interpretation of x-rays and bone density measurements].
Pollähne W; Pfeifer M; Minne HW
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2007; 157(23-24):593-605. PubMed ID: 18204960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Lumbar bone density. Risk factor for vertebral fractures in women].
Kudlacek S; Schneider B; Resch H; Willvonseder R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1998 May; 123(21):651-7. PubMed ID: 9638092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital vertebral morphometry performed by DXA: a valuable opportunity for identifying fractures during bone mass assessment.
Muszkat P; Camargo MB; Peters BS; Kunii LS; Lazaretti-Castro M
Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2015 Apr; 59(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 25993670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. BMD measurements of the spine derived from sagittal reformations of contrast-enhanced MDCT without dedicated software.
Baum T; Müller D; Dobritz M; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Bauer JS
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e140-5. PubMed ID: 20851544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vertebral fractures in men and women: how discriminative are bone mass measurements?
Stewart A; Felsenberg D; Kalidis L; Reid DM
Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):614-20. PubMed ID: 7627484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Equivalent deficits in bone mass of the vertebral body and posterior processes in women with vertebral fractures: implications regarding the pathogenesis of spinal osteoporosis.
Seeman E; Formica C; Mosekilde L
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):2005-10. PubMed ID: 8619382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT.
Lang TF; Li J; Harris ST; Genant HK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 10050823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MRI-based Vertebral Bone Quality Score for Osteoporosis Screening Based on Different Osteoporotic Diagnostic Criteria Using DXA and QCT.
Yin H; Lin W; Xie F; He C; Chen T; Zheng G; Wang Z
Calcif Tissue Int; 2023 Oct; 113(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 37493798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
