238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8505715)
41. Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting.
Fuerst T; Wu C; Genant HK; von Ingersleben G; Chen Y; Johnston C; Econs MJ; Binkley N; Vokes TJ; Crans G; Mitlak BH
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Jul; 20(7):1199-205. PubMed ID: 19083074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Diagnosis of vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment.
Damiano J; Kolta S; Porcher R; Tournoux C; Dougados M; Roux C
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 16731433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Assessing osteoporosis: CT's quantitative advantage.
Genant HK
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1985 Aug; 7(8):52-7. PubMed ID: 11540861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Peripheral bone densitometry: an old friend revisited.
Kleerekoper M; Nelson DA
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1998; 109():62-70; discussion 70-2. PubMed ID: 9601128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bone mass measurement: how, where, when and why?
Delmas PD
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38 Suppl 2():70-6. PubMed ID: 8252108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Guglielmi G
Eur J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 20(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 8536745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Men suffer vertebral fractures with similar spinal T-scores to women.
del Rio L; Peris P; Jover L; Guañabens N; Monegal A; Di Gregorio S
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2008; 26(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 18565250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Risk of vertebral fractures in men: relationship to mineral density of the vertebral body.
Resch A; Schneider B; Bernecker P; Battmann A; Wergedal J; Willvonseder R; Resch H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jun; 164(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 7754890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of Paget's disease of bone on areal lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by DXA, and density of cortical and trabecular bone measured by quantitative CT.
Cherian RA; Haddaway MJ; Davie MW; McCall IW; Cassar-Pullicino VN
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):720-6. PubMed ID: 11089462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia.
Finkelstein JS; Cleary RL; Butler JP; Antonelli R; Mitlak BH; Deraska DJ; Zamora-Quezada JC; Neer RM
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1994 Mar; 78(3):724-30. PubMed ID: 8126149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Relationships between metacarpal morphometry, forearm and vertebral bone density and fractures in post-menopausal women.
Wishart JM; Horowitz M; Bochner M; Need AG; Nordin BE
Br J Radiol; 1993 May; 66(785):435-40. PubMed ID: 8319065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Advantages of peripheral radiogrametry over dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women.
Meema HE; Meindok H
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Aug; 7(8):897-903. PubMed ID: 1442203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Comparative bone density measurements in healthy women and women with osteoporosis].
Reinbold WD; Genant HK; Dinkel E
Radiologe; 1988 Apr; 28(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 3289080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Addressing gaps in osteoporosis screening in kuwait using opportunistic quantitative computer tomography (QCT): a retrospective study.
Qadan L; Ahmed A
Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Apr; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 37061624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Total body, spine, and femur dual X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
Nuti R; Martini G; Gennari C
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Dec; 53(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 8293352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The spine deformity index in osteoporosis is not related to bone mineral and ultrasound measurements.
Bernecker P; Pietschmann P; Winkelbauer F; Krexner E; Resch H; Willvonseder R
Br J Radiol; 1992 May; 65(773):393-6. PubMed ID: 1611418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Quantitative Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Calcifications Using Lateral Lumbar Radiograph, Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, and Quantitative Computed Tomography of the Spine.
Setiawati R; Di Chio F; Rahardjo P; Nasuto M; Dimpudus FJ; Guglielmi G
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 25708122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Bone densitometry: patients with end-stage renal disease.
Erlichman M; Holohan TV
Health Technol Assess (Rockv); 1996 Mar; (8):1-27. PubMed ID: 8722234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of Traction on Interpretation of Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A New Measurement Method and Diagnostic Criteria Based on Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Quantitative Computed Tomography.
Lee JS; Kim K; Jeon YK; Kim J; Jung DH; Kim SH; Shin MJ; Shin YB
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 30143440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods.
Reinbold WD; Genant HK; Reiser UJ; Harris ST; Ettinger B
Radiology; 1986 Aug; 160(2):469-78. PubMed ID: 3726129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
