BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 850574)

  • 1. Evaluation of abnormal cervical cytology.
    Ronk DA; Jimerson GK; Merrill JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 850574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of colposcopy directed biopsies and cold knife conization in patients with abnormal cytology.
    Hovadhanakul P; Mehra U; Terragno A; Taylor HB; Cavanagh D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Mar; 142(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 1251312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage.
    Spirtos NM; Schlaerth JB; d'Ablaing G; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
    el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Talebian F; Shayan A; Krumholz BA; Palladino VS; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 49(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 865729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
    Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V; Tseng P
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RO-TAGE biopsy. An improved method of endocervical evaluation.
    Mann WJ; Chumas J; Rochelson B; Funt M; Westermann C
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):376-8. PubMed ID: 4009558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.
    Saltzman DH; Evans MI; Warsof SL; Friedman AJ
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
    Myllynen L; Karjalainen O
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Preliminary report on the application of colposcopy in screening of cervical carcinoma].
    Zhang WH; Sun JH; Wu AR
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1994 Jan; 16(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 8033752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
    Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
    J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cruikshank DP; Kaminsky DB; Ekbladh LE
    J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec; 17(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 1003398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
    Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.