These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8505901)

  • 1. Nontriggered magnetic resonance velocity measurement of the time-average of pulsatile velocity.
    Hofman MB; Kouwenhoven M; Sprenger M; van Rossum AC; Valk J; Westerhof N
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 May; 29(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 8505901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of time-averaged flow as measured by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography, a phantom evaluation.
    Bakker CJ; Kouwenhoven M; Hartkamp MJ; Hoogeveen RM; Mali WP
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 13(7):959-65. PubMed ID: 8583874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring blood flow by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography.
    Bakker CJ; Hartkamp MJ; Mali WP
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 14(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 8897363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-resolved absolute velocity quantification with projections.
    Langham MC; Jain V; Magland JF; Wehrli FW
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Dec; 64(6):1599-606. PubMed ID: 20677235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR pulsatility measurements in peripheral arteries: preliminary results.
    Krug B; Kugel H; Harnischmacher U; Heindel W; Schmidt R; Krings F
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Nov; 34(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 8544690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of flip angle on volume flow measurement with nontriggered phase-contrast MR: In vivo evaluation in carotid and basilar arteries.
    Tanaka H; Fujita N; Takahashi H; Sakai M; Nagao T; Murase K; Nakamura H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 29(5):1218-23. PubMed ID: 19388100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid measurement of time-averaged blood flow using ungated spiral phase-contrast.
    Park JB; Olcott EW; Nishimura DG
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Feb; 49(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 12541253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accelerated radial Fourier-velocity encoding using compressed sensing.
    Hilbert F; Wech T; Hahn D; Köstler H
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 24(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 24239136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of physiologic waveform variability in triggered MR imaging: theoretical analysis.
    Lauzon ML; Holdsworth DW; Frayne R; Rutt BK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(6):853-67. PubMed ID: 7865947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of imaging parameters, flow velocity, and pulsatile flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: experimental studies.
    Kodama T; Watanabe K
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 Dec; 26(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 9481591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High speed bolus tagging: time resolved velocity quantification of pulsatile flow in a single breath hold.
    Chien D; Saloner D; Laub G; Simonetti O; Anderson CM
    Magn Reson Med; 1994 Nov; 32(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 7808269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation.
    Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging kappa-space segmentation using phase-encoding groups the accuracy of quantitative measurements of pulsatile flow.
    Li H; Clarke GD; NessAvier M; Liu H; Peshock R
    Med Phys; 1995 Apr; 22(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 7609719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical simulation of in vitro pulsatile flow and its study using FRISK, a rapid phase contrast technique.
    Li L; Doyle M; Rayarao G; Kortright E; Ito Y; Anayiotos A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 17729352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined analysis of spatial and velocity displacement artifacts in phase contrast measurements of complex flows.
    Steinman DA; Ethier CR; Rutt BK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 9090588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arterial MR imaging phase-contrast flow measurement: improvements with varying velocity sensitivity during cardiac cycle.
    Ringgaard S; Oyre SA; Pedersen EM
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):289-94. PubMed ID: 15220510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Bohning DE; Pettigrew RI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 1446110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of average flow in ungated 3D phase contrast angiograms.
    Maier SE; Cline HE; Jolesz FA
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Nov; 34(5):706-12. PubMed ID: 8544691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro and in vivo comparison of three MR measurement methods for calculating vascular shear stress in the internal carotid artery.
    Masaryk AM; Frayne R; Unal O; Krupinski E; Strother CM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Feb; 20(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 10094344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of MR phase-contrast measurements of pulsatile velocity waveforms.
    Hangiandreou NJ; Rossman PJ; Riederer SJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(2):387-94. PubMed ID: 8448401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.