These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8505901)
1. Nontriggered magnetic resonance velocity measurement of the time-average of pulsatile velocity. Hofman MB; Kouwenhoven M; Sprenger M; van Rossum AC; Valk J; Westerhof N Magn Reson Med; 1993 May; 29(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 8505901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and precision of time-averaged flow as measured by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography, a phantom evaluation. Bakker CJ; Kouwenhoven M; Hartkamp MJ; Hoogeveen RM; Mali WP Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 13(7):959-65. PubMed ID: 8583874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of imaging parameters, flow velocity, and pulsatile flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: experimental studies. Kodama T; Watanabe K Eur J Radiol; 1997 Dec; 26(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 9481591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High speed bolus tagging: time resolved velocity quantification of pulsatile flow in a single breath hold. Chien D; Saloner D; Laub G; Simonetti O; Anderson CM Magn Reson Med; 1994 Nov; 32(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 7808269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging kappa-space segmentation using phase-encoding groups the accuracy of quantitative measurements of pulsatile flow. Li H; Clarke GD; NessAvier M; Liu H; Peshock R Med Phys; 1995 Apr; 22(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 7609719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Numerical simulation of in vitro pulsatile flow and its study using FRISK, a rapid phase contrast technique. Li L; Doyle M; Rayarao G; Kortright E; Ito Y; Anayiotos A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 17729352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined analysis of spatial and velocity displacement artifacts in phase contrast measurements of complex flows. Steinman DA; Ethier CR; Rutt BK J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 9090588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements. Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Bohning DE; Pettigrew RI J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 1446110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of average flow in ungated 3D phase contrast angiograms. Maier SE; Cline HE; Jolesz FA Magn Reson Med; 1995 Nov; 34(5):706-12. PubMed ID: 8544691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro and in vivo comparison of three MR measurement methods for calculating vascular shear stress in the internal carotid artery. Masaryk AM; Frayne R; Unal O; Krupinski E; Strother CM AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Feb; 20(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 10094344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]