These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 850663)

  • 1. Clinical fetal monitoring: its effect on cesarean section rate and perinatal mortality: five-year trends.
    Paul RH; Huey JR; Yaeger CF
    Postgrad Med; 1977 Apr; 61(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 850663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Lee WK; Baggish MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 1264397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Labor monitoring and fetal health.
    Roux JF
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1976; 5():139-65. PubMed ID: 980272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Perinatal mortality control in the U.S.S.R].
    Monrozies M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1974; 3(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 4470738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor.
    Shenker L; Post RC; Seiler JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrapartum fetal monitoring. Maternal and fetal morbidity and perinatal mortality.
    Chan WH; Paul RH; Toews J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jan; 41(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 4682619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal monitoring: is it worth it?
    Quilligan EJ; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Jan; 45(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 122861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pregnancy outcome in the patient with a nonreactive nonstress test and a positive contraction stress test.
    Slomka C; Phelan JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 7457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experiences with fetal monitoring in a community hospital.
    Kelly VC; Kulkarni D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jun; 41(6):818-24. PubMed ID: 4708480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The nonstress test: a review of 3,000 tests.
    Phelan JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 7457525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic monitoring of the fetal heart rate and uterine contractions during cesarean section under balanced anesthesia.
    Timor-Tritsch I; Gergely Z; Abramovici H; Brandes JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 48(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 948373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal monitoring: its effect on the perinatal mortality and cesarean section rates and its complications.
    Tutera G; Newman RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Jul; 122(6):750-4. PubMed ID: 1155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical experience with cardiotocographic monitoring of 1,111 pregnant women during pregnancy and delivery].
    Lenstrup C; Jaszczak P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1977 May; 139(20):1164-8. PubMed ID: 855008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    McCrann DJ; Schifrin BS
    Clin Perinatol; 1974 Sep; 1(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 4470056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of breech presentation at term.
    Rovinsky JJ; Miller JA; Kaplan S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb; 115(4):497-513. PubMed ID: 4685501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices.
    Mueller-Heubach E; MacDonald HM; Joret D; Portman MA; Edelstone DI; Caritis SN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 7405966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefits and detriments of fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Parer JT
    Semin Perinatol; 1978 Apr; 2(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 734449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specialized perinatal care: impact on perinatal mortality.
    Papageorgiou AN; Masson M; Shatz R; Gelfand MM
    Can Med Assoc J; 1977 Mar; 116(5):506-7. PubMed ID: 556975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fetal intensive care unit: an evolving concept.
    Boehm FH
    South Med J; 1974 Oct; 67(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 4416273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of a trial of labor with a positive contraction stress test.
    Bissonnette JM; Johnson K; Toomey C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 135(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 484615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.