These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. The mismatch negativity component reveals the sensory memory during REM sleep in humans. Atienza M; Cantero JL; Gómez CM Neurosci Lett; 1997 Nov; 237(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9406870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm. Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Influence of stimulation parameters on auditory stimulus processing in schizophrenia and major depression: an auditory evoked potential study. Adler G; Adler J; Schneck M; Armbruster B Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1990 May; 81(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 2356768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The development of memory trace depending on the number of the standard stimuli. Matuoka T; Yabe H; Shinozaki N; Sato Y; Hiruma T; Ren A; Hara E; Kaneko S Clin EEG Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 37(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 16929709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Mismatch negativity and P300 to behaviorally perceptible and imperceptible frequency and intensity contrasts. White L; Stuart A Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):425-30. PubMed ID: 22185057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A modified oddball paradigm "cross-modal delayed response" and the research on mismatch negativity. Wei JH; Chan TC; Luo YJ Brain Res Bull; 2002 Jan; 57(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 11849829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Differential effects of voluntary expectancies on reaction times and event-related potentials: evidence for automatic and controlled expectancies. Matt J; Leuthold H; Sommer W J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):810-22. PubMed ID: 1385618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Mechanisms of generation of mismatch negativity and their role in discrimination of short acoustical stimuli]. Aleksandrov AA; Babanin ME; Stankevich LN Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2002 Jul; 88(7):809-16. PubMed ID: 12238348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions in humans as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Takegata R; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Winkler I Neurosci Lett; 1999 May; 266(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 10353339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Electrophysiological evidence of developmental changes in the duration of auditory sensory memory. Gomes H; Sussman E; Ritter W; Kurtzberg D; Cowan N; Vaughan HG Dev Psychol; 1999 Jan; 35(1):294-302. PubMed ID: 9923483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Nonprimary auditory thalamic representation of acoustic change. Kraus N; McGee T; Littman T; Nicol T; King C J Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 72(3):1270-7. PubMed ID: 7807210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Automatic detection of frequency changes depends on auditory stimulus intensity. Salo S; Lang AH; Aaltonen O; Lertola K; Kärki T Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 10386852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. Giard MH; Perrin F; Pernier J; Bouchet P Psychophysiology; 1990 Nov; 27(6):627-40. PubMed ID: 2100348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]