152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8508202)
1. [Celioscopic lymphatic excision and perineal radical prostatectomy: a strategy for the treatment of prostatic cancer].
Melman A; Gladshteyn M; Stifelman M
Prog Urol; 1993 Apr; 3(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 8508202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Radical prostatectomy: comparison of the perineal and retropubic route (40 patients). Preliminary results].
Doublet JD; Lagrange L; Ciofu C; Thibault P; Gattegno B
Prog Urol; 1994 Feb; 4(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 8186791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.
Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Novara G; Wilson TG
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 23351148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of lymph node yield and clinical outcomes when including common iliac nodes with standard template dissection.
Katz DJ; Yee DS; Godoy G; Nogueira L; Chong KT; Coleman JA
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 20089113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The complications of retropubic radical prostatectomy].
Abad Vivas-Pérez JI; Rodríguez-Rubio Cortadellas FI; Martín-Marquina Aspiunza A; Díez-Caballero Alonso F; Rosell Costa D; Robles García JE; Zudaire Bergera JJ; Berián Polo JM
Actas Urol Esp; 1997 Apr; 21(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 9265407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomy.
Parra RO; Boullier JA; Rauscher JA; Cummings JM
J Urol; 1994 Jun; 151(6):1599-602. PubMed ID: 8189572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.
Berglund RK; Sadetsky N; DuChane J; Carroll PR; Klein EA
J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):526-29; discussion 529-30. PubMed ID: 17222625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.
Yates J; Haleblian G; Stein B; Miller B; Renzulli J; Pareek G
Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4842-6. PubMed ID: 19796462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Sub-venous iliac lymphatic dissection with celioscopy for the staging of prostatic cancer (16 patients)].
Doublet JD; Gattegno B; d'Acremont B; Lukacs B; Thibault P
Prog Urol; 1992 Dec; 2(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 1302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and modified belt radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Lerner SE; Fleischmann J; Taub HC; Chamberlin JW; Kahan NZ; Melman A
Urology; 1994 Apr; 43(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 8154070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
Tse E; Knaus R
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical perineal prostatectomy and simultaneous extended pelvic lymph node dissection via the same incision.
Keller H; Lehmann J; Beier J
Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 17084507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
