These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8508847)

  • 1. Automatic film processors' quality control test in Greek military hospitals.
    Lymberis C; Efstathopoulos EP; Manetou A; Poudridis G
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 16(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 8508847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pilot study on the quality control of film processing in medical radiology laboratories in Greece.
    Hourdakis CJ- ; Delakis J; Kamenopoulou V; Balougias H; Papageorgiou E
    Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 33(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 10674786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of poor control of film processors on mammographic image quality.
    Kimme-Smith C; Sun H; Bassett LW; Gold RH
    Radiographics; 1992 Nov; 12(6):1137-46. PubMed ID: 1439016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of a clinical thermometer for measuring developer temperature in automatic film processors.
    Wilson WB; Haus AG; Nierman C; Lillie R; Batz T; Moore R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):823-4. PubMed ID: 8350843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the "STEP Test" to evaluate processing speed in Moroccan hospitals.
    Nfaoiu K; Bentayeb F; Basraoui O; Azevedo AC
    Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19963422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of mammographic film processor performance in a hospital and mobile screening unit.
    Murray JG; Dowsett DJ; Laird O; Ennis JT
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1097-101. PubMed ID: 1286417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elimination of electrostatic discharges in automatic daylight film processor systems. A simple, cost-effective solution. Technical note.
    Asp T; Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 2509205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Film processor quality assurance: increasing reliability while decreasing costs.
    Adams MJ; Barsotti JB; Kohler TD; Reel LA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):709-10. PubMed ID: 8079873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Experiences with processing control in the radiology department of a large municipal hospital].
    von Volkmann T; Piasecki M; Kugler B; Hammacher A; Klotz E
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Dec; 39(12):362-6. PubMed ID: 3809923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
    Göthlin JH; Alders B
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic film processing: analysis of 9 years of observations.
    Suleiman OH; Conway BJ; Rueter FG; Slayton RJ
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1523318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M
    Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Daily quality control programme in mammography.
    Nassivera E; Nardin L
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):148-52. PubMed ID: 8785643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Results of a program of quality control in radiodiagnosis].
    Belletti S; Catolla Cavalcanti R; Gallini R; Giugni U
    Radiol Med; 1983 Apr; 69(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 6856887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
    Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinically acceptable tolerance of roentgen generator exposure parameters.
    Forsberg H
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 2952133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.