178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8508935)
1. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography.
Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8508935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbed radiation doses during tomographic examinations in dental implant planning: a study in humans.
Zenóbio EG; Zenóbio MA; Nogueira MS; Silva TA; Shibli JA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 20491821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Organ radiation dose assessment for conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; van Steenberghe D; Bosmans H; Sanderink GC; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 11168275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric study of mandible examinations performed with three cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
Khoury HJ; Andrade ME; Araujo MW; Brasileiro IV; Kramer R; Huda A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):162-5. PubMed ID: 25897144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
Chau AC; Fung K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose to the lens of eye and thyroid gland in paranasal sinus multislice CT.
Zammit-Maempel I; Chadwick CL; Willis SP
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 76(906):418-20. PubMed ID: 12814929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Low-dose computerized tomography of the jaw bone in pre-implantation diagnosis. Limits of dose reduction and accuracy of distance measurements].
Hassfeld S; Streib S; Sahl H; Stratmann U; Fehrentz D; Zöller J
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 Jul; 2(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 9738367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography.
Bianchi J; Goggins W; Rudolph M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 10936846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry of absorbed radiation in radiographic cephalometry.
Gilda JE; Maillie HD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 May; 73(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 1518655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The radiation loading of the crystalline lens and thyroid during high-resolution computed tomography of the teeth].
Schüller H; Köster O; Ewen K
Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 1739781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose to the lens from computed tomography scanning in a neuroradiology department.
Maclennan AC; Hadley DM
Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):19-22. PubMed ID: 7881877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiation exposure during spiral-CT of the paranasal sinuses].
Dammann F; Momino-Traserra E; Remy C; Pereira PL; Baumann I; Koitschev A; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2000 Mar; 172(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 10778453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from tomography for dental implant installation. Spiral tomography using the Scanora technique compared with hypocycloidal tomography.
Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 1397458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
