These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8508940)

  • 1. Alignment errors in bitewing radiographs using uncoupled positioning devices.
    Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 8508940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of beam alignment using different bite-wing radiographic techniques.
    Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Harrell JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Apr; 79(4):532-5. PubMed ID: 7614218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of X-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic assessment of alveolar crest level.
    Zulqarnain BJ; Almas K
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(4):132-8. PubMed ID: 10530200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of alignment errors on bitewing-based bone loss measurements.
    Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Oct; 18(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 1960240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Deviations of the central ray in standardized bite-wing radiographs].
    Schulz A; Müller HP; Topoll HH; Lange DE
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Jul; 46(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 1817919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of bitewing positioning devices in children's dentistry.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C; Rimmer PA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 1807994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a simple intraoral instrument to standardize film alignment and improve image reproducibility.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF; Xu XJ; Zhang JC; Xia B; Dong YF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jul; 100(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 15953923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP dental x-ray film holder and orientation devices in dentistry.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(1):8, 10, 12-4 passim. PubMed ID: 21443076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-related changes of in vivo projection errors in standardized radiographs.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 64(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 8483090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of technical errors in pediatric bitewing radiographs acquired with round vs rectangular collimation.
    Campbell RE; Anderson D; Strauss K; Brown C; Fenchel M; Wilson S; Scarfe W
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Mar; 133(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 34627711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial development and in vitro evaluation of the HPL device for obtaining reproducible bitewing radiographs of children.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 May; 71(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 2047107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP-ORA: a three-function dental X-ray film positioning device for taking anterior and posterior periapical and bitewing intraoral radiographs.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(3):38-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 21739876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.
    Parrott LA; Ng SY
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the diagnostic quality of bitewing radiographs: a review.
    Chadwick BL; Dummer PH
    Br Dent J; 1998 Jan; 184(2):80-4; discussion 77. PubMed ID: 9489215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bitewing film quality: a clinical comparison of the loop vs. holder techniques.
    Kositbowornchai S; Phadannorg T; Permpoonsinsook M; Thinkhamrop B
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15119720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of repeat bitewing radiographs determined by measurement of the distance between the amelocemental junction and the alveolar crest: an ex vivo study using human skulls.
    Bishop K; Dummer PM; Kingdon A; Newcombe RG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 8617391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pediatric bitewing film holder: preschoolers' acceptance and radiographs' diagnostic quality.
    Pierro VS; Barcelos R; de Souza IP; Raymundo RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 18767515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a simple modified radiographic alignment system for routine use.
    Carpio LC; Hausmann E; Dunford RG; Allen KM; Christersson LA
    J Periodontol; 1994 Jan; 65(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 8133416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.