These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8509105)

  • 1. Performance under dichoptic versus binocular viewing conditions: effects of attention and task requirements.
    Kimchi R; Gopher D; Rubin Y; Raij D
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 8509105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dichoptic and physical information combination: a comparison.
    Uttal WR; Baruch T; Allen L
    Perception; 1995; 24(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 7675616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye.
    Westendorf DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 2527957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants.
    Brown RJ; Candy TR; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(13):3324-33. PubMed ID: 10586959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monocular and dichoptic interactions between moving and stationary stimuli.
    Wade NJ; Swanston MT
    Perception; 1993; 22(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 8041594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objects look different sizes in the right and left eyes.
    McManus IC; Tomlinson J
    Laterality; 2004 Jul; 9(3):245-65. PubMed ID: 15341425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of visual aftereffects and inferences about binocular mechanisms in human vision.
    Wilcox LM; Timney B; St John R
    Perception; 1990; 19(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 2336334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems.
    Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1522-31. PubMed ID: 18501948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults, and in adults with amblyopia.
    Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 17126872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of primary visual cortex in the binocular integration of plaid motion perception.
    Saint-Amour D; Walsh V; Guillemot JP; Lassonde M; Lepore F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1107-15. PubMed ID: 15787716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.
    Kamphuisen AP; van Wezel RJ; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditions required for binocular rivalry suppression.
    Freeman AW; Li DF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):174-82. PubMed ID: 19304607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mental rotation, physical rotation, and surface media.
    Jolicoeur P; Cavanagh P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):371-84. PubMed ID: 1593224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Chong SC; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(11):1794-803. PubMed ID: 16368126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemifield differences in perceived spatial frequency.
    Edgar GK; Smith AT
    Perception; 1990; 19(6):759-66. PubMed ID: 2130373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual Percepts in the Cases of Binocular and Monocular Viewing Stabilized Test Objects, Ganzfeld Stimuli, and Prolonged Afterimages.
    Rozhkova GI; Nikolaev PP
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):934-51. PubMed ID: 26562910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry?
    Yu K; Blake R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1158-73. PubMed ID: 1431750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of crowding and interocular interactions in a resolution acuity task.
    Masgoret X; Asper L; Alexander J; Suttle C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9452-6. PubMed ID: 22058333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry.
    Fukuda H; Blake R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):362-70. PubMed ID: 1593223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.