BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8509305)

  • 1. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response to stimulation of different sites in the cochlea.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 66(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 8509305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of wave I of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in the guinea pig.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):35-44. PubMed ID: 8226348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
    Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response-based evaluation of the spatial distribution of auditory neuronal tissue in common cavity deformities.
    Yamazaki H; Naito Y; Fujiwara K; Moroto S; Yamamoto R; Yamazaki T; Sasaki I
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1394-402. PubMed ID: 24770408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
    Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acute study on the neuronal excitability of the cochlear nuclei of the guinea pig following electrical stimulation.
    Liu X; McPhee G; Seldon HL; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 9199522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation.
    Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Rask-Andersen H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Development of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response modules of REZ-I domestic cochlear implant device].
    Ding X; Zhang R; Xu C; Fan W; Zhang D
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 49(12):1013-6. PubMed ID: 25623869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
    Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of electrically evoked 'auditory' brainstem responses elicited with the nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear implant.
    Allum JH; Shallop JK; Hotz M; Pfaltz CR
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 2150110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level.
    Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 1991 Jan; 51(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 2013539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
    Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.
    Hall RD
    Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):123-36. PubMed ID: 2345111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.