These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8509736)

  • 21. The adaptation and sealing ability of light-cured glass ionomer retrograde root fillings.
    Chong BS; Pitt Ford TR; Watson TF
    Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 1813426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Leakage of amalgam, composite, and Super-EBA, compared with a new retrofill material: bone cement.
    Holt GM; Dumsha TC
    J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 11194361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro evaluation of micromarginal leakage of three filling systems--an autoradiographic analysis using radio isotope S35 as a tracer.
    Mohandas U; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1993 Mar; 11(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8040699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
    Ozer F; Unlü N; Oztürk B; Sengun A
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11931139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MTA versus Portland cement as repair material for furcal perforations: a laboratory study using a polymicrobial leakage model.
    De-Deus G; Petruccelli V; Gurgel-Filho E; Coutinho-Filho T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Apr; 39(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 16584492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A dye penetration study of retrofilling materials.
    Tuggle ST; Anderson RW; Pantera EA; Neaverth EJ
    J Endod; 1989 Mar; 15(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 2607280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A study of the apical microleakage of a gallium alloy as a retrograde filling material.
    Hosoya N; Lautenschlager EP; Greener EH
    J Endod; 1995 Sep; 21(9):456-8. PubMed ID: 8537788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of tricure glass ionomer cement as an apical sealant after apicoectomy.
    Pretorius S; van Heerden WF
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1995 Aug; 50(8):360-70. PubMed ID: 8613588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of cavity varnish and intermediate restorative material on coronal microleakage in endodontically treated tooth.
    Singh SV; Nikhil V; Yadav S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 21525687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal sealing ability of four restorative materials placed in root surfaces.
    Chan MF; Jones JC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8180614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.
    Youngson CC; Holguin SM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An electrochemical study of the sealing ability of different retrofilling materials.
    Alhadainy HA; Elsaed HY; Elbaghdady YM
    J Endod; 1993 Oct; 19(10):508-11. PubMed ID: 8120486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative radioactive analysis of microleakage of four different retrograde fillings.
    Danin J; Linder L; Sund ML; Strömberg T; Torstenson B; Zetterqvist L
    Int Endod J; 1992 Jul; 25(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 1399068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
    Prabhu NT; Munshi AK; Shetty TR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An in vitro evaluation of plaster of Paris barriers used under amalgam and glass ionomer to repair furcation perforations.
    Alhadainy HA; Himel VT
    J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):449-52. PubMed ID: 7996116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study on sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium enriched cement and bone cement in furcal perforations.
    Nazari Moghadam K; Aghili H; Rashed Mohassel A; Zahedpasha S; Moghadamnia AA
    Minerva Stomatol; 2014 Jun; 63(6):203-10. PubMed ID: 25267149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium phosphate cement, and glass ionomer cement in the repair of furcation perforations.
    Singh P; Paul J; Al-Khuraif AA; Vellappally S; Halawany HS; Hashim M; Abraham NB; Jacob V; Thavarajah R
    Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2013; 56(3):97-103. PubMed ID: 24592746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.