These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8510746)

  • 21. Problems in clinical trials go far beyond misconduct.
    Nowak R
    Science; 1994 Jun; 264(5165):1538-41. PubMed ID: 8202708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Journal rekindles row over Silver Spring monkeys.
    Gavaghan H
    New Sci; 1991 Jul; 131(1776):15. PubMed ID: 11656075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conduct unbecoming?
    Weiss P
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The case of the altered notebooks: Part IV.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):809. PubMed ID: 2188358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Crucial research data in report biologist signed are held fake.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What next in the Gallo case?
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):944-5. PubMed ID: 1948080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A U.S. experiment on young children ignites painful debate.
    Moss M
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1996 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11648019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
    Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. US panel rejects hiding source of allegations of misconduct.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6398):765. PubMed ID: 1436045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Science police.
    Dolnick E
    Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.