198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8511279)
1. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of Class II composite resin restorations.
Blixt M; Coli P
Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 8511279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in Class II composite resin restorations applied in bulk or in two increments.
Coli P; Brännström M
Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):583-91. PubMed ID: 8272497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
Shortall AC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of photoactivation methods and low modulus liners on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
Alonso RC; Cunha LG; Correr GM; De Goes MF; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM; Sinhoreti MA
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Dec; 62(6):298-304. PubMed ID: 15848972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
Mason PN; Ferrari M
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures.
Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19049529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
