These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8511280)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of amalgam and composite resin cores retained by various intradentinal retentive features.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR; Lee JK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 8511280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins.
    Kao EC; Hart S; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups.
    Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of strengths of five core and post-and-core systems.
    Möllersten L; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 11890028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The retention of amalgam and composite resin by a smooth, reverse-tapered pin.
    Brackett WW; Bailey JH
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):152-5. PubMed ID: 1287596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compressive shear strength of core materials and restoring techniques.
    Sahmali SM; Saygili G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Jun; 20(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 11203569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photoelastic stress analysis of self-threading pins.
    Ragain JC; Yaman P; Craig RG
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(6):218-23. PubMed ID: 8152993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: An in vitro study.
    Xible AA; de Jesus Tavarez RR; de Araujo Cdos R; Bonachela WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 16543020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of pin-retained amalgam and composite resin cores.
    Fujimoto J; Norman RD; Dykema RW; Phillips RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 May; 39(5):512-9. PubMed ID: 349141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 11199599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Study on composite resin cores. Part 2. Effect of pressing composite resin].
    Nagano Y; Miyamoto S; Kokubo Y; Kamiyama T; Noghuchi S; Hanamura N
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1989 Sep; 15(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 2486718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amalgam buildups: shear strength and dentin sealing properties.
    Pashley EL; Comer RW; Parry EE; Pashley DH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(3):82-9. PubMed ID: 1803337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations.
    Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems.
    Al-Omiri MK; Al-Wahadni AM
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):890-9. PubMed ID: 17014528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading.
    Dilmener FT; Sipahi C; Dalkiz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 16473087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.
    Yenisey M; Kulunk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 18182184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.