142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8512510)
1. Computed tomography pelvimetry: accuracy and radiation dose compared with conventional pelvimetry.
Morris CW; Heggie JC; Acton CM
Australas Radiol; 1993 May; 37(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 8512510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. X-ray pelvimetry--which is the best technique?
Badr I; Thomas SM; Cotterill AD; Pettett A; Oduko JM; Fitzgerald M; Adam EJ
Clin Radiol; 1997 Feb; 52(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9043048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can three-dimensional pelvimetry using low-dose stereoradiography replace low-dose CT pelvimetry?
Aubry S; Padoin P; Petegnief Y; Vidal C; Riethmuller D; Delabrousse E
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Sep; 99(9):569-576. PubMed ID: 29567122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low dose pelvimetry with biplane digital radiography.
Lotz H; Ekelund L; Hietala SO; Eriksson L; Wiklund DE; Wickman G
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 2960351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiographs and CT].
Resten A; Mausoléo F; Suissa M; Valéro M; Taylor S; Musset D
J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 82(9 Pt 1):991-6. PubMed ID: 11591927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT pelvimetry: the foveae are not an accurate landmark for the level of the ischial spines.
Aronson D; Kier R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):527-30. PubMed ID: 1899750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Obstetric pelvimetry using digital radiography (CT topogram)].
Reisner K; Fettig O; Bartscher KH; Knappschneider U
Rofo; 1985 May; 142(5):566-9. PubMed ID: 2988045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelvimetry by digital radiography and its dosimetry.
Claussen C; Köhler D; Christ F; Golde G; Lochner B
J Perinat Med; 1985; 13(6):287-92. PubMed ID: 4087118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Pelvimetry by digitalized radiography].
Adam P; Alberge Y; Sablayrolles JL; Grandjean B
J Radiol; 1986 Jan; 67(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3701674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomographic pelvimetry.
Lenke RR; Shuman WP
J Reprod Med; 1986 Oct; 31(10):958-60. PubMed ID: 3783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of X-ray pelvimetry and CT pelvimetry.
Raman S; Samuel D; Suresh K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Aug; 31(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 1804081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dosage in computed tomographic and X-ray pelvimetry.
Gafoor FA; Moodley J; Rana MD; Bassa A; Chamberlain AC
S Afr Med J; 1994 Jun; 84(6):368-9. PubMed ID: 7740403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Pelvimetry with compute tomography].
Martinsen AC; Risdal M; Bay T; Drolsum A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(15):2023-5. PubMed ID: 16100544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Pelvimetry using computerized tomography. I. Theoretical and methodical fundamentals].
Herrmann K; Ketscher KD; Siering U; Retzke U; Schmidt M
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(19):1209-15. PubMed ID: 2267874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A low-dose CT-pelvimetry.
Suramo I; Torniainen P; Jouppila P; Kirkinen P; Lähde S
Br J Radiol; 1984 Jan; 57(673):35-7. PubMed ID: 6704646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvimetry by digital radiography: a low-dose examination.
Federle MP; Cohen HA; Rosenwein MF; Brant-Zawadzki MN; Cann CE
Radiology; 1982 Jun; 143(3):733-5. PubMed ID: 7079500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in the use of pelvimetry techniques.
Thomas SM; Bees NR; Adam EJ
Clin Radiol; 1998 Apr; 53(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 9585047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pelvic outlet. A comparison between clinical evaluation and radiologic pelvimetry.
Floberg J; Belfrage P; Carlsson M; Ohlsen H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 3739644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical note: digital radiographic pelvimetry--a novel, low dose, accurate technique.
Wright DJ; Godding L; Kirkpatrick C
Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):528-30. PubMed ID: 7788241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Helical CT pelvimetry: advantages of a low dose volume acquisition technique].
Breidt D; Bouquigny F; Clément JP; Menéchal P; Levert M; Quéreux C; Piérot L
J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):1027-30. PubMed ID: 13679759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
