These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8513107)

  • 1. Constrained randomization in a therapeutic efficacy trial.
    Tamura RN; Mills BJ; Lovelace JK
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):249-58. PubMed ID: 8513107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential monitoring of randomization tests: stratified randomization.
    Zhang Y; Rosenberger WF; Smythe RT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 17825016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of stratification factors and score-scales in clinical trials of treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cows.
    Hektoen L; Ødegaard SA; Løken T; Larsen S
    J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med; 2004 May; 51(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 15265177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to estimate the variance of an endpoint from an on-going blinded trial.
    Xing B; Ganju J
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1807-14. PubMed ID: 15803440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
    Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of conditional and unconditional randomization tests for highly stratified designs.
    Flyer PA
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1551-9. PubMed ID: 9883551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient generation of constrained block allocation sequences.
    Salama I; Ivanova A; Qaqish B
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(9):1421-8. PubMed ID: 17729381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting event times in clinical trials when randomization is masked and blocked.
    Donovan JM; Elliott MR; Heitjan DF
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 17942464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs.
    Atkinson AC
    Biostatistics; 2003 Apr; 4(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 12925515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy evaluation for monotherapies in two-by-two factorial trials.
    Hung HM; Chi GY; O'Neill RT
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1483-93. PubMed ID: 8589235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Block response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Magirr D
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 22328326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal estimator for the survival distribution and related quantities for treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.
    Wahed AS; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 15032782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blinded assessment of treatment effects utilizing information about the randomization block length.
    Miller F; Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1690-706. PubMed ID: 19340815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust tests for treatment comparisons based on recurrent event responses.
    Cook RJ; Lawless JF; Nadeau C
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):557-71. PubMed ID: 8672703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cox regression methods for two-stage randomization designs.
    Lokhnygina Y; Helterbrand JD
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 17425633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A parallel phase I/II clinical trial design for combination therapies.
    Huang X; Biswas S; Oki Y; Issa JP; Berry DA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 17688495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re-estimating the sample size of an on-going blinded trial based on the method of randomization block sums.
    Ganju J; Xing B
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 18837073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.