These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8513757)
1. National Academy of Sciences enters controversy on relevance of animal toxicologic studies. Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Apr; 101(1):19. PubMed ID: 8513757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. National and international services for primate animal research. Kalter SS J Med Primatol; 1983; 12(3):146-54. PubMed ID: 6680141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human health effects of hazardous chemical exposures. Conn Med; 1984 Jul; 48(7):459-64. PubMed ID: 6467934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Criteria, rules and procedures adopted by IARC in evaluating risks from different carcinogenic agents for humans]. IARC Vopr Onkol; 2007; 53(6):621-41. PubMed ID: 18416130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ATSDR evaluation of health effects of benzene and relevance to public health. Wilbur S; Wohlers D; Paikoff S; Keith LS; Faroon O Toxicol Ind Health; 2008; 24(5-6):263-398. PubMed ID: 19022880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Animal biotechnology. Environmental impact seen as biggest risk. Stokstad E Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5585):1257. PubMed ID: 12193761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human pesticide testing gets qualified OK. Renner R Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(10):175A-176A. PubMed ID: 15212239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk. Kaiser J Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2189. PubMed ID: 11567118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Monitoring human tissues for toxic substances: a follow-up to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report. Bailar JC Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Apr; 103 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):81-4. PubMed ID: 7635117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The BEIR III controversy. Fabrikant JI Radiat Res; 1980 Dec; 84(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 6893865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The high production volume chemical challenge program: the relevance of the in vivo micronucleus assay. Rosenkranz HS; Cunningham AR Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Apr; 31(2 Pt 1):182-9. PubMed ID: 10854124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. National Academy of Sciences report--an evaluation of activated carbon for drinking water treatment. Suffet IH J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1987; 7(7-8):9-32. PubMed ID: 3320338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National Academy of Sciences endorses National Institutes of Health plan for enhanced access to research information. Cozzarelli NR; Fulton KR; Sullenberger DM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Oct; 101(42):14991. PubMed ID: 15479758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. PNAS joins peer-reviewed PubMed Central. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Macilwain C Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):733. PubMed ID: 10548089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A turning point for conflicts of interest: the controversy over the National Academy of Sciences' first conflicts of interest disclosure policy. Parascandola M J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(24):3774-9. PubMed ID: 17704427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NAS report: strengthen agbio regs and relations. National Academy of Sciences. Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2000 May; 18(5):486. PubMed ID: 10802605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of extant community-based epidemiologic studies on health effects of hazardous wastes. Miller AB Toxicol Ind Health; 1996; 12(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 8794535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. National Academy of Sciences report on nursing home regulation. Gebhardt RB Nurs Homes; 1986; 35(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 10284043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. science policy. Obama courts a smitten audience at the national academy. Mervis J Science; 2009 May; 324(5927):576-7. PubMed ID: 19407168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]