These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8513813)

  • 1. Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Schuffenecker I; Freydière A; de Montclos H; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Apr; 12(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 8513813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Lebeau B; Kervroedan P; Faure O; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7574109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of six commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Buchaille L; Freydière AM; Guinet R; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jul; 17(7):479-88. PubMed ID: 9764550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates.
    Meletiadis J; Arabatzis M; Bompola M; Tsiveriotis K; Hini S; Petinaki E; Velegraki A; Zerva L
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 49(7):2722-7. PubMed ID: 21543578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of four commercialized biochemical systems for clinical yeast identification by colour-producing reactions.
    Paugam A; Benchetrit M; Fiacre A; Tourte-Schaefer C; Dupouy-Camet J
    Med Mycol; 1999 Feb; 37(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10200929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.
    Posteraro B; Efremov L; Leoncini E; Amore R; Posteraro P; Ricciardi W; Sanguinetti M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2439-50. PubMed ID: 25994160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of yeast-like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system.
    Hantschke D
    Mycoses; 1996; 39(3-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 8767008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the auxacolor system for biochemical identification of medically important yeasts.
    Sheppard DC; deSouza E; Hashmi Z; Robson HG; René P
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Dec; 36(12):3726-7. PubMed ID: 9817909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Biolog system for the identification of food and beverage yeasts.
    Praphailong W; Van Gestel M; Fleet GH; Heard GM
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 24(6):455-9. PubMed ID: 9203401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional and rapid methods for yeast identification.
    Lin CC; Fung DY
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1987; 14(4):273-89. PubMed ID: 3308316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of VITEK 2 and RapID yeast plus systems for yeast species identification: experience at a large clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Sanguinetti M; Porta R; Sali M; La Sorda M; Pecorini G; Fadda G; Posteraro B
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1343-6. PubMed ID: 17287333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simplified techniques for identifying foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 19(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 8357753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid identification of clinical yeast isolates using the colorimetric AUXACOLOR system.
    Romney MG; Bryce EA; Rennie RP; Sand CA
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Feb; 36(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 10705057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards versus fluorimetric cards for identification of yeasts.
    Loïez C; Wallet F; Sendid B; Courcol RJ
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Dec; 56(4):455-7. PubMed ID: 16935457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.