These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8514500)

  • 41. Variation in childbirth services in California: a cross-sectional survey of childbirth hospitals.
    Korst LM; Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Wyatt L; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):523.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26275353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of patient risk on the volume-outcome relationship in obstetric delivery services.
    Lee KS; Kwak JM
    Health Policy; 2014 Dec; 118(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 24957418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Global measures of quality- and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates?
    Gregory KD; Fridman M; Shah S; Korst LM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 200(6):681.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19482115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.
    Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG
    Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessing Medicaid patients' perceptions of the OB/GYN-patient relationship.
    Crutchfield TN; Eveland VB; Eveland AP
    Health Mark Q; 2002; 19(4):21-37. PubMed ID: 12557987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How hospital ownership affects access to care for the uninsured.
    Norton EC; Staiger DO
    Rand J Econ; 1994; 25(1):171-85. PubMed ID: 10132574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hospital rates of maternal and neonatal infection in a low-risk population.
    Korst LM; Fridman M; Friedlich PS; Lu MC; Reyes C; Hobel CJ; Chavez GF; Gregory KD
    Matern Child Health J; 2005 Sep; 9(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 16160757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric center: 8-year evaluation.
    Habek D; Becareviç R
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 17139172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Hospital experience and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: which patients benefit most from treatment at highly experienced hospitals?
    Ward MM
    J Rheumatol; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1198-206. PubMed ID: 12064835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perceived quality of care in pregnancy assessment before and after delivery.
    Lledó R; Rodríguez T; Trilla A; Cararach V; Restuccia JD; Asenjo MA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 Jan; 88(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10659914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Bypassing rural hospitals for obstetrics care.
    Bronstein JM; Morrisey MA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1991; 16(1):87-118. PubMed ID: 2066540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Segmentation in local hospital markets.
    Dranove D; White WD; Wu L
    Med Care; 1993 Jan; 31(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 8417270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing the validity of insurance coverage data in hospital discharge records: California OSHPD data.
    Buchmueller TC; Allen ME; Wright W
    Health Serv Res; 2003 Oct; 38(5):1359-72. PubMed ID: 14596395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Analysis of the attraction of an obstetrical service. Analysis of preferences according to geographic distance, sociocultural level and previous medical experiences].
    Tresmontant R; Richard A; Papiernik E
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1985; 33(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 4011991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Improving recording accuracy, transparency, and performance for obstetric quality measures in a community hospital-based obstetrics department.
    Gilbert WM; Bliss MC; Johnson A; Farrell W; Gregg L; Swanson C
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2013 Jun; 39(6):258-66. PubMed ID: 23789163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The sensitivity of conditional choice models for hospital care to estimation technique.
    Garnick DW; Lichtenberg E; Phibbs CS; Luft HS; Peltzman DJ; McPhee SJ
    J Health Econ; 1989; 8(4):377-97. PubMed ID: 10296934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Patterns of obstetric infection rates in a large sample of US hospitals.
    Goff SL; Pekow PS; Avrunin J; Lagu T; Markenson G; Lindenauer PK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 208(6):456.e1-13. PubMed ID: 23395644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of physician characteristics in conditional choice models for hospital care.
    Burns LR; Wholey DR
    J Health Econ; 1992 May; 11(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 10119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Lessons for providers and hospitals from Philadelphia's obstetric services closures and consolidations, 1997-2012.
    Lorch SA; Martin AE; Ranade R; Srinivas SK; Grande D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Dec; 33(12):2162-9. PubMed ID: 25489034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Patients experiences after hospitalization at Gynecologic Obstetrics Department: Identifying parts for improvement.
    Drabiščáková P; Balažovjechová B; Križko M; Papcun P; Oťapková P; Záhumenský J
    Ceska Gynekol; 2020; 85(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 32414286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.