131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8514546)
1. Positional stability of sources during low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma.
Corn BW; Galvin JM; Soffen EM; Henze G; Schwaibold F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Jun; 26(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8514546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patterns of brachytherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the cervix (1996-1999): a patterns of care study.
Erickson B; Eifel P; Moughan J; Rownd J; Iarocci T; Owen J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1083-92. PubMed ID: 16099599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of brachytherapy applicators geometry on dose distribution in cervical cancer.
Senkus-Konefka E; Kobierska A; Jassem J; Serkies K; Badzio A
Strahlenther Onkol; 1997 Jun; 173(6):323-9. PubMed ID: 9209530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of "optimized" treatment planning for tandem and ring, and tandem and ovoids, using high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Noyes WR; Peters NE; Thomadsen BR; Fowler JF; Buchler DA; Stitt JA; Kinsella TJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 7995771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A dosimetric comparison between applicators used for brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix - A single-institute prospective study.
Suryadevara A; Kumar MV; Vasundhara E; Alluri KR; Ahamed S; Guduru S
Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(3):230-232. PubMed ID: 30693884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between tandem and ovoids and interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy dosimetry using a hypothetical computer model.
Hsu IC; Speight J; Hai J; Vigneault E; Phillips T; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Feb; 52(2):538-43. PubMed ID: 11872302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for low-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix.
Nag S; Chao C; Erickson B; Fowler J; Gupta N; Martinez A; Thomadsen B;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jan; 52(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 11777620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Problems in reporting doses and volumes during multiple high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix as per ICRU Report 38: a comparative study using flexible and rigid applicators.
Datta NR; Basu R; Das KJ; Rajasekar D; Pandey CM; Ayyagari S
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 91(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 14599857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positional variation of applicators during low dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a prospective study.
Koushik K; Bilimagga R; Rao N; Janaki MG; Ponni A; Rajeev AG
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2010 Sep; 2(3):93-97. PubMed ID: 27853469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparision of four different dose specification methods for high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mai J; Erickson B; Rownd J; Gillin M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 11704338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dose delivered to vagina using two different intracavitary brachytherapy applicators for carcinoma cervix.
Bajwa HK; Talluri AK; Maqbool A; Reddy D; Singareddy R; Sresty NM; Raju AK
Brachytherapy; 2022; 21(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 34756698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of intracavitary brachytherapy parameters and correlation with outcome in patients with carcinoma of the cervix.
Katz A; Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1417-25. PubMed ID: 11121642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of the Fletcher family of gynecologic colpostats 1950-1980.
Haas JS; Dean RD; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Jul; 11(7):1317-21. PubMed ID: 4008289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High dose rate versus low dose rate intracavity brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervix cancer.
Wang X; Liu R; Ma B; Yang K; Tian J; Jiang L; Bai ZG; Hao XY; Wang J; Li J; Sun SL; Yin H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jul; (7):CD007563. PubMed ID: 20614461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The variability of applicator position among high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy applications in cervical cancer patients treated with ring & tandem applicators.
Ebruli C; Demiral AN; Cetingöz R; Eyiler F; Kinay M
Tumori; 2007; 93(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 18038874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional applicator system for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Weeks KJ; Montana GS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 9069321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High versus low dose rate intracavitary irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kim WC; Kim GE; Suh CO; Loh JJ
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2001 Sep; 31(9):432-7. PubMed ID: 11689597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of prototype shielded cervical intracavitary brachytherapy applicators compatible with CT and MR imaging.
Price MJ; Jackson EF; Gifford KA; Eifel PJ; Mourtada F
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5515-24. PubMed ID: 20095264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 2D vs. 3D dosimetry for Rotte 'Y' applicator high dose rate brachytherapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer.
Beriwal S; Kim H; Heron DE; Selvaraj R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 5(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 16981795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomic variation of gynecologic brachytherapy prescription points.
Grigsby PW; Georgiou A; Williamson JF; Perez CA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Oct; 27(3):725-9. PubMed ID: 8226170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
