These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8515992)

  • 1. Noise in D- and E-speed radiographic film.
    Southard TE; Southard KA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jun; 75(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 8515992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
    Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary alveolar bone imaging. Wiener filter design.
    Southard TE; Southard KA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 May; 75(5):645-9. PubMed ID: 8488033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial resolution and angular alignment tolerance in radiometric analysis of alveolar bone change.
    Shrout MK; Weaver J; Potter BJ; Hildebolt CF
    J Periodontol; 1996 Jan; 67(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 8676272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements.
    Hildebolt CF; Bartlett TQ; Brunsden BS; Hente NL; Gravier MJ; Walkup RK; Shrout MK; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7835512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative clinical study of group D and E dental film.
    Frommer HH; Jain RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jun; 63(6):738-42. PubMed ID: 3473400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic imaging assessment of experimental intraoral "folded film".
    Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 3475649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of E-speed film with added filtration.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Underhill TE; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 3458135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basic imaging properties of a new screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Higashida Y; Murakami Y; Yoshida A; Kastuda N; Moribe N; Bussaka H; Hamada T; Yoshida Y; Hidetoshi M; Takahashi M
    Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1351-7. PubMed ID: 8873032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.