These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings. Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic and linguistic factors affecting perceptual dissimilarity judgments of voices. Perrachione TK; Furbeck KT; Thurston EJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3384. PubMed ID: 31795676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 2314068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia. Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inexperienced Listeners' Perception of Timbre Dissimilarity Within and Between Voice Categories. Erickson ML J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):302.e1-302.e13. PubMed ID: 30316552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experienced Listeners' Perception of Timbre Dissimilarity Within and Between Voice Categories. Stone TC; Erickson ML J Voice; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37302910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow Glottogram Characteristics and Perceived Degree of Phonatory Pressedness. Millgård M; Fors T; Sundberg J J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 26001499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissimilarity and the classification of male singing voices. Erickson ML J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 17134873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores. Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners. Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception. Shrivastav R J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 16165342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multidimensional scaling analysis of dysphonia in two speaker groups. Kempster GB; Kistler DJ; Hillenbrand J J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 2072677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings. Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of acoustic and perceptual factors on perceived hypernasality in the vowel. Kataoka R; Zajac DJ; Mayo R; Lutz RW; Warren DW Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(4):198-212. PubMed ID: 11385279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of listeners' linguistic background on perceptual judgements of hypernasality. Lee A; Brown S; Gibbon FE Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 22612628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of experience on perceptual spaces when judging synthesized voice quality: a multidimensional scaling study. Kisenwether JS; Prosek RA J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 24929934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]