These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8516383)

  • 21. Dissimilarity and the classification of female singing voices: a preliminary study.
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2003 Jun; 17(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 12825652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.
    Sofranko JL; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 24119637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of Children's Productions of /l/: Acoustic Correlates and Effects of Listener Experience.
    Coniglio EA; Chung H; Schellinger SK
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(6):392-406. PubMed ID: 35367979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
    Bele IV
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Free-classification of perceptually similar speakers with dysarthria.
    Lansford KL; Liss JM; Norton RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Dec; 57(6):2051-64. PubMed ID: 25057892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.
    Sell G; Suied C; Elhilali M; Shamma S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):911-22. PubMed ID: 25698023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of English vowels by bilingual Chinese-English and corresponding monolingual listeners.
    Yang J; Fox RA
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):215-37. PubMed ID: 25102607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevalence of vocal fry in young adult male American English speakers.
    Abdelli-Beruh NB; Wolk L; Slavin D
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 24315658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM; Nandur V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):323-35. PubMed ID: 15989395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1291-302. PubMed ID: 7962996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multidimensional classification of normal voice qualities.
    Singh S; Murry T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jul; 64(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 712004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of analogy instruction for pitch variation on perceptual ratings of other speech parameters.
    Tse AC; Wong AW; Ma EP; Whitehill TL; Masters RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):906-12. PubMed ID: 23811473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing two methods for reducing variability in voice quality measurements.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):803-12. PubMed ID: 21081673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2217-24. PubMed ID: 14587619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Voice Quality in Native and Foreign Languages Investigated by Inverse Filtering and Perceptual Analyses.
    Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):261.e25-261.e31. PubMed ID: 27495969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What makes a voice masculine: physiological and acoustical correlates of women's ratings of men's vocal masculinity.
    Cartei V; Bond R; Reby D
    Horm Behav; 2014 Sep; 66(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 25169905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.