150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8516699)
1. An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer.
Murrell GA; Coonrad RW; Moorman CT; Fitch RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 May; 18(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 8516699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.
Côté P; Kreitz BG; Cassidy JD; Dzus AK; Martel J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):796-802; discussion 803. PubMed ID: 9563110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter and intra-rater reliability of the scoliometer.
Bonagamba GH; Coelho DM; Oliveira AS
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2010; 14(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 21049239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer.
Korovessis PG; Stamatakis MV
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1661-6. PubMed ID: 8839469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.
Qiao J; Xu L; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Liu Z; Qian B; Qiu Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():343. PubMed ID: 25305758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.
Ma HH; Tai CL; Chen LH; Niu CC; Chen WJ; Lai PL
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Dec; 16(1):136. PubMed ID: 29202876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the Adams forward bend test and the scoliometer in a scoliosis school screening setting.
Grossman TW; Mazur JM; Cummings RJ
J Pediatr Orthop; 1995; 15(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 7560050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer.
Amendt LE; Ause-Ellias KL; Eybers JL; Wadsworth CT; Nielsen DH; Weinstein SL
Phys Ther; 1990 Feb; 70(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 2296610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and concurrent validity of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Prowse A; Aslaksen B; Kierkegaard M; Furness J; Gerdhem P; Abbott A
World J Orthop; 2017 Jan; 8(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 28144582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of compensatory curve spontaneous derotation after selective thoracic or lumbar fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Ritzman TF; Upasani VV; Bastrom TP; Betz RR; Lonner BS; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2643-7. PubMed ID: 19011546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of Cobb angle in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis.
Sapkas G; Papagelopoulos PJ; Kateros K; Koundis GL; Boscainos PJ; Koukou UI; Katonis P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun; (411):32-9. PubMed ID: 12782857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis.
Izatt MT; Bateman GR; Adam CJ
Scoliosis; 2012 Jul; 7(1):14. PubMed ID: 22846346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Potter BK; Rosner MK; Lehman RA; Polly DW; Schroeder TM; Kuklo TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1658-63. PubMed ID: 16025037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
Coelho DM; Bonagamba GH; Oliveira AS
Braz J Phys Ther; 2013; 17(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 23778766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Axial plane analysis of Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as an aid to identify curve characteristics.
Atmaca H; Inanmaz ME; Bal E; Caliskan I; Kose KC
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2425-33. PubMed ID: 24534387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer variation in assessing spinal curvature and skeletal development in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Goldberg MS; Poitras B; Mayo NE; Labelle H; Bourassa R; Cloutier R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Dec; 13(12):1371-7. PubMed ID: 3212571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric clinical evaluation methods of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.
Prowse A; Pope R; Gerdhem P; Abbott A
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):450-66. PubMed ID: 25917824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of the iPhone to measure rib hump in scoliosis.
Balg F; Juteau M; Theoret C; Svotelis A; Grenier G
J Pediatr Orthop; 2014 Dec; 34(8):774-9. PubMed ID: 24787301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior universal spine system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a follow-up study using scoliometer, real-time ultrasound and radiographs.
Burwell RG; Aujla KK; Cole AA; Kirby AS; Pratt KK; Webb JK; Moulton A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():473-6. PubMed ID: 15457780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
