These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8516897)

  • 1. Evaluation of potential kidney donors using digital subtraction angiography.
    Shokeir AA; el-Diasty TA; Shaaban AA; el-Kenawey M; Eraky I; Ghoneim MA
    Transplant Proc; 1993 Jun; 25(3):2272-3. PubMed ID: 8516897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of potential renal donors and renal allograft recipients: digital video subtraction angiography.
    Hillman BJ; Zukoski CF; Ovitt TW; Ogden DA; Capp MP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 May; 138(5):921-5. PubMed ID: 7044079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outpatient angiographic evaluation of living renal donors.
    Spencer W; Streem SB; Geisinger MA; Novick AC; Steinmuller DR; Zelch MG; Risius B
    J Urol; 1988 Dec; 140(6):1364-6. PubMed ID: 3057223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angiographic assessment of potential renal transplant donors.
    Derauf B; Goldberg ME
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Mar; 25(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 3547473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in living renal donors: diagnostic agreement, impact on decision making, and costs.
    Kock MC; Ijzermans JN; Visser K; Hussain SM; Weimar W; Pattynama PM; Krestin GP; Hunink MG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):448-56. PubMed ID: 16037519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outpatient renal donor evaluation with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Streem SB; Spencer W; Geisinger MA; Novick AC; Steinmuller DR; Zelch MG; Risius B
    Transplantation; 1987 Nov; 44(5):717-8. PubMed ID: 3318041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of living related renal transplant donors.
    Flechner SM; Rauschkolb EN; Cohen G; Sandler CM; Ben-Menachem Y; Van Buren CT; Payne WD; Kahan BD
    Transplantation; 1982 Jun; 33(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 7048665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 100 living-related kidney donor evaluations using digital subtraction angiography.
    Flechner SM; Sandler CM; Houston GK; Van Buren CT; Lorber MI; Kahan BD
    Transplantation; 1985 Dec; 40(6):675-8. PubMed ID: 3907042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital subtraction angiography for renal donor evaluation.
    Cho WH; Jacobs SC; Lawson RK
    Urology; 1987 Sep; 30(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 3307096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limitations of digital subtraction angiography in evaluating potential renal donors.
    Rabe FE; Smith EJ; Yune HY; Klatte EC; Leapman SB; Filo RS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jul; 141(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 6344602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of renal angiography in living potential kidney donors.
    Kjellevand TO; Kolmannskog F; Pfeffer P; Scholz T; Fauchald P
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Sep; 32(5):368-70. PubMed ID: 1910989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: evaluation of renal arteries in living renal transplant donors.
    Firat A; Akin O; Agildere AM; Aytekin C; Haberal M
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 52(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15380851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of living related kidney donors using digital subtraction angiography.
    Flechner SM; Sandler CM; Ben-Menachem Y; Van Buren CT; Kahan BD
    Cleve Clin Q; 1984; 51(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 6380819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Use of digital subtraction angiography in the multiposition study of the kidneys].
    Vos'mirko OD; Ukolov VA; Elagin OS; Sal'nikov DV
    Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1987; (5):25-8. PubMed ID: 3321659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors?
    Giessing M; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Feldmann C; Deger S; Turk I; Budde K; Ebeling V; Schoenberger B; Loening SA
    Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):1000-2. PubMed ID: 14508369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Renal magnetic resonance angiography with Gd-DTPA in living renal transplant donors.
    Agildere AM; Tutar NU; Demirag A; Boyvat F; Coskun M; Haberal M
    Transplant Proc; 1999 Dec; 31(8):3317-9. PubMed ID: 10616490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compact contrast material bolus with a new 5-F angiographic catheter.
    Zemel G; Benenati JF; Becker GJ; Katzen BT; Sallee DS
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1991 May; 2(2):279-80. PubMed ID: 1799768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examination of renal donors as outpatients using intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and a pigtail catheter.
    Caridi JG; Devane AM; Hawkins IF; Newman R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 9242771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Potential use of the computerized substraction angiography method in patients with kidney lesions].
    Vos'mirko OD; Ukolov VA; Semchenko EA; Zharov IN
    Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1986; (4):44-6. PubMed ID: 3532487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast-spoiled gradient magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries for potential living renal transplant donors: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.
    Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Sheikh M; Al-Moosawi M; Al-Khawari H
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Jun; 49(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 15932463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.