These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Use of digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of living related renal transplant donors. Flechner SM; Rauschkolb EN; Cohen G; Sandler CM; Ben-Menachem Y; Van Buren CT; Payne WD; Kahan BD Transplantation; 1982 Jun; 33(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 7048665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital subtraction angiography for renal donor evaluation. Cho WH; Jacobs SC; Lawson RK Urology; 1987 Sep; 30(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 3307096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Limitations of digital subtraction angiography in evaluating potential renal donors. Rabe FE; Smith EJ; Yune HY; Klatte EC; Leapman SB; Filo RS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jul; 141(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 6344602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of renal angiography in living potential kidney donors. Kjellevand TO; Kolmannskog F; Pfeffer P; Scholz T; Fauchald P Acta Radiol; 1991 Sep; 32(5):368-70. PubMed ID: 1910989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: evaluation of renal arteries in living renal transplant donors. Firat A; Akin O; Agildere AM; Aytekin C; Haberal M Eur J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 52(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15380851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of living related kidney donors using digital subtraction angiography. Flechner SM; Sandler CM; Ben-Menachem Y; Van Buren CT; Kahan BD Cleve Clin Q; 1984; 51(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 6380819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of digital subtraction angiography in the multiposition study of the kidneys]. Vos'mirko OD; Ukolov VA; Elagin OS; Sal'nikov DV Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1987; (5):25-8. PubMed ID: 3321659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors? Giessing M; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Feldmann C; Deger S; Turk I; Budde K; Ebeling V; Schoenberger B; Loening SA Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):1000-2. PubMed ID: 14508369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Renal magnetic resonance angiography with Gd-DTPA in living renal transplant donors. Agildere AM; Tutar NU; Demirag A; Boyvat F; Coskun M; Haberal M Transplant Proc; 1999 Dec; 31(8):3317-9. PubMed ID: 10616490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compact contrast material bolus with a new 5-F angiographic catheter. Zemel G; Benenati JF; Becker GJ; Katzen BT; Sallee DS J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1991 May; 2(2):279-80. PubMed ID: 1799768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examination of renal donors as outpatients using intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and a pigtail catheter. Caridi JG; Devane AM; Hawkins IF; Newman R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 9242771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Potential use of the computerized substraction angiography method in patients with kidney lesions]. Vos'mirko OD; Ukolov VA; Semchenko EA; Zharov IN Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1986; (4):44-6. PubMed ID: 3532487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast-spoiled gradient magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries for potential living renal transplant donors: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography. Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Sheikh M; Al-Moosawi M; Al-Khawari H Australas Radiol; 2005 Jun; 49(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 15932463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]