These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8517004)

  • 1. Serological reactions to Brucella species in British pigs.
    Wrathall AE; Broughton ES; Gill KP; Goldsmith GP
    Vet Rec; 1993 May; 132(18):449-54. PubMed ID: 8517004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
    Riber U; Jungersen G
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Incidence of antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica in swine sera in relation to the serological differentiation of Brucella infections].
    Schmittdiel E; von Wangenheim B; Chorherr S
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 98(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3985937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immunoblot studies in the differential diagnosis of porcine brucellosis: an immunodominant 62 kDa protein is related to the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat shock protein (HSP-65).
    Spencer SA; Broughton ES; Hamid S; Young DB
    Vet Microbiol; 1994 Mar; 39(1-2):47-60. PubMed ID: 8203127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Swine brucellosis in Indonesia.
    van der Giessen JW; Priadi A
    Vet Q; 1988 Jul; 10(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 3176296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Garin-Bastuji B; Hummel N; Gerbier G; Cau C; Pouillot R; Da Costa M; Fontaine JJ
    Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of three serological tests for antibody to Brucella suis in pigs.
    Rogers RJ; Cook DR; Ketterer PJ; Baldock FC; Blackall PJ; Stewart RW
    Aust Vet J; 1989 Mar; 66(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 2712774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Serologic response of pigs to experimental infection with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O9 and Brucella abortus.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Mar; 42(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 6791534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
    Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seroprevalence of Brucella suis in eastern Latvian wild boars (Sus scrofa).
    Grantina-Ievina L; Avsejenko J; Cvetkova S; Krastina D; Streikisa M; Steingolde Z; Vevere I; Rodze I
    Acta Vet Scand; 2018 Mar; 60(1):19. PubMed ID: 29573743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey of brucellosis in goats and sheep in the Yemen Arab Republic: comparison of tests for Brucella melitensis infection in sheep.
    Hosie BD; Al-Bakri OM; Futter RJ
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 1985 May; 17(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 4024267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The porcine brucellosis--evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in occurrence of false positive serological reactions.
    Weiner M; Szulowski K; Iwaniak W
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2013; 16(1):129-30. PubMed ID: 23691587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Normal complete antibodies in swine from Brucella antigen].
    Nguen Ngok Ha
    Vet Med Nauki; 1973; 10(6):45-9. PubMed ID: 4802903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A serological survey of the prevalence of brucellosis in pigs in Kenya.
    Waghela S; Gathuma JM
    Bull Anim Health Prod Afr; 1976 Sep; 24(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 16300348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay as a serological test for the presumptive diagnosis of porcine brucellosis.
    Nielsen K; Gall D; Smith P; Vigliocco A; Perez B; Samartino L; Nicoletti P; Dajer A; Elzer P; Enright F
    Vet Microbiol; 1999 Aug; 68(3-4):245-53. PubMed ID: 10510043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observations on serological cross-reactions between smooth Brucella species and organisms of other genera.
    Corbel MJ; Stuart FA; Brewer RA
    Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():341-8. PubMed ID: 6489620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reproduction of Brucella titers in swine using experimental infection with Yersinia enterocolitica, serotypes 0:9 and 0:6].
    Nattermann H; Horsch F; Zimmermann H
    Arch Exp Veterinarmed; 1980; 34(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 6779772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serological and molecular analysis for brucellosis in selected swine herds from Southern India.
    Shome R; Kalleshamurthy T; Natesan K; Jayaprakash KR; Byrareddy K; Mohandoss N; Sahay S; Shome BR; Hiremath J; Rahman H; Barbuddhe SB
    J Infect Public Health; 2019; 12(2):247-251. PubMed ID: 30448370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction of non-specific reactions to the Brucella abortus serum agglutination test by the addition of EDTA.
    Macmillan AP; Cockrem DS
    Res Vet Sci; 1985 May; 38(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 3925508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of a field-based dot-ELISA kit with three other serological tests for the detection of Brucella antibodies in goats.
    Singh SV; Gupta VK; Singh N
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2000 Jun; 32(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 10907286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.