149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8518308)
41. A comparison between two different concentration of contrast media with multidetector CT for the study of abdominal vascular system.
Squillaci E; Fanucci E; Masala S; Nisini A; Tomassini M; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2002 Oct; 104(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 12569315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Novel connecting tube for saline chaser in contrast-enhanced CT: the effect of spiral flow of saline on contrast enhancement.
Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Awai K; Yuba K; Kobayashi T; Park YK; Yagi T; Harada K; Yamashita Y
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3213-8. PubMed ID: 23756959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT.
Hollett MD; Jorgensen MJ; Jeffrey RB
Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):359-61. PubMed ID: 7724753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography.
Galanski M; Prokop M; Chavan A; Schaefer CM; Jandeleit K; Nischelsky JE
Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 8372191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Determination of scan delay time in spiral CT-angiography: utility of a test bolus injection.
van Hoe L; Marchal G; Baert AL; Gryspeerdt S; Mertens L
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 7890844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Computed tomographic enhancement of the liver, liver abscesses, spleen, and major vessels with perfluorooctylbromide emulsion. Influence of dosage and injection velocity in an animal model.
Adam G; Günther RW; Schiffer C; Görtz H; Prescher A; Scherer K
Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 1399453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Clinical evaluation of a computer simulated prediction model of contrast enhancement of the liver in spiral CT.
Schöber W; Kopp A; Scherf C; Mehnert F; Heuschmid M; Duda SH; Claussen CD; Pereira P
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 51(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 15186880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Triple-split-bolus versus single-bolus CT in abdominal trauma patients: a comparative study.
Godt JC; Eken T; Schulz A; Johansen CK; Aarsnes A; Dormagen JB
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1038-1044. PubMed ID: 29350048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Optimizing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in infants and children using bolus tracking.
Frush DP; Spencer EB; Donnelly LF; Zheng JY; DeLong DM; Bisset GS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1007-13. PubMed ID: 10587137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prediction of the time to peak hepatic enhancement to optimize contrast-enhanced spiral CT.
Irie T; Suzuki S; Yamauchi T; Kusano S
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 7710795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative prediction of contrast enhancement from test bolus data in cardiac MSCT.
Mahnken AH; Rauscher A; Klotz E; Mühlenbruch G; Das M; Günther RW; Wildberger JE
Eur Radiol; 2007 May; 17(5):1310-9. PubMed ID: 17115164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. 64-section multidetector CT of the upper abdomen: optimization of a saline chaser injection protocol for improved vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement.
Marin D; Nelson RC; Guerrisi A; Barnhart H; Schindera ST; Passariello R; Catalano C
Eur Radiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):1938-47. PubMed ID: 21556911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. CT attenuation of normal liver parenchyma on delayed scanning with iohexol.
Tidebrant G; Lukes P; Wihed A
Acta Radiol; 1992 Sep; 33(5):502-3. PubMed ID: 1389665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of different saline chaser volumes and flow rates on intravascular contrast enhancement in CT using a circulation phantom.
Behrendt FF; Bruners P; Keil S; Plumhans C; Mahnken AH; Das M; Ackermann D; Günther RW; Mühlenbruch G
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Mar; 73(3):688-93. PubMed ID: 19349133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Low- versus high-osmolality contrast media.
Rouvière O; Ecochard R; Berger P; Pangaud C; Fontaine B; Lyonnet D
Acta Radiol; 2000 Sep; 41(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 11016777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of a single-pass with biphasic intravenous contrast medium injection CT protocol for the assessment of complications post-simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant.
Chung DY; Anderson EM
Clin Radiol; 2018 Jul; 73(7):677.e7-677.e11. PubMed ID: 29625745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Determining the optimal timing for early arterial phase hepatic CT imaging by measuring abdominal aortic enhancement in variable contrast injection protocols.
Murakami T; Onishi H; Mikami K; Iannaccone R; Federle MP; Kim T; Hori M; Okada A; Marukawa T; Higashihara H; Passariello R; Nakamura H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16628033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Determination of blood circulation time for optimizing contrast medium administration in CT angiography].
Puskás Z; Schuierer G
Radiologe; 1996 Sep; 36(9):750-7. PubMed ID: 8999453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Technic of injecting a contrast medium bolus for serial computed tomography].
Klöppel R; Wittek W
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1985; 26(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 4023200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
