These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8518898)

  • 1. Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients.
    Eyre-Brook IA; Codling BW; Gear MW
    Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 8518898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
    Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG
    Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
    Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Hill AD; Walsh TN; Bolger CM; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1994 Jan; 81(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 8313128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Gear MW; Gillison EW; Dowling BL
    Br J Surg; 1984 Sep; 71(9):681-3. PubMed ID: 6383512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Nissen total and Lind partial transabdominal fundoplication in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Walker SJ; Holt S; Sanderson CJ; Stoddard CJ
    Br J Surg; 1992 May; 79(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 1596721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term symptom control of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease 12 years after laparoscopic Nissen or 180° anterior partial fundoplication in a randomized clinical trial.
    Roks DJ; Broeders JA; Baigrie RJ
    Br J Surg; 2017 Jun; 104(7):852-856. PubMed ID: 28158901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Angelchik antireflux device: a 5-year experience.
    Timoney AG; Kelly JM; Welfare MR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 May; 72(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 2357036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia.
    Leguit P; Hagen WB; Laarman J
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Jun; 39(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 3614751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux surgery in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis.
    Gourley GR; Pellett JR; Li BU; Adkins WN
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1986 Jan; 5(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 2935608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Maxwell-Armstrong CA; Steele RJ; Amar SS; Evans D; Morris DL; Foster GE; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1997 Jun; 84(6):862-4. PubMed ID: 9189111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Chinese randomized prospective trial of floppy Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal disease.
    Wang B; Zhang W; Liu S; Du Z; Shan C; Qiu M
    Int J Surg; 2015 Nov; 23(Pt A):35-40. PubMed ID: 26360740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the management of failed Angelchik prosthesis.
    Jalil O; Zia MK; Hassn A; Morcous P
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 21190477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized double-blind trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus anterior partial fundoplication.
    Baigrie RJ; Cullis SN; Ndhluni AJ; Cariem A
    Br J Surg; 2005 Jul; 92(7):819-23. PubMed ID: 15898129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux using the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Starling JR; Reichelderfer MO; Pellett JR; Belzer FO
    Ann Surg; 1982 Jun; 195(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 7082060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective cross-sectional study of laparoscopic subtotal Lind fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--a durable and effective anti-reflux procedure.
    Shapey IM; Agrawal S; Peacock A; Super P
    Int J Surg; 2015 Jan; 13():257-260. PubMed ID: 25529280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.