These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8518996)

  • 21. Segmentation of prostate boundaries from ultrasound images using statistical shape model.
    Shen D; Zhan Y; Davatzikos C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Apr; 22(4):539-51. PubMed ID: 12774900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound using magnetic resonance imaging priors.
    Zeng Q; Samei G; Karimi D; Kesch C; Mahdavi SS; Abolmaesumi P; Salcudean SE
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jun; 13(6):749-757. PubMed ID: 29589259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automated texture-based segmentation of ultrasound images of the prostate.
    Richard WD; Keen CG
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1996; 20(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 8930465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prostate segmentation in 2D ultrasound images using image warping and ellipse fitting.
    Badiei S; Salcudean SE; Varah J; Morris WJ
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):17-24. PubMed ID: 17354751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
    Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transrectal ultrasound based prostate volume determination: is the frustum algorithm more accurate than planimetry?
    Liu D; Usmani N; Sloboda RS
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031705. PubMed ID: 23464300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Innovative approaches in prostate cancer ultrasound].
    Loch T
    Urologe A; 2006 Jun; 45(6):692, 694-8, 700-1. PubMed ID: 16788786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal-based needle segmentation algorithm for transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy procedures.
    Cool DW; Gardi L; Romagnoli C; Saikaly M; Izawa JI; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1660-73. PubMed ID: 20443487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rotational-slice-Based prostate segmentation using level set with shape constraint for 3D end-firing TRUS guided biopsy.
    Qiu W; Yuan J; Ukwatta E; Tessier D; Fenster A
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):537-44. PubMed ID: 23285593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prostatic imaging: the role of transrectal ultrasound.
    Anderson JE
    Aust Fam Physician; 1995 Apr; 24(4):557-8, 560-1. PubMed ID: 7771961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Needle segmentation using 3D Hough transform in 3D TRUS guided prostate transperineal therapy.
    Qiu W; Yuchi M; Ding M; Tessier D; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042902. PubMed ID: 23556924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The applicability of simultaneous TRUS-CT imaging for the evaluation of prostate seed implants.
    Steggerda M; Schneider C; van Herk M; Zijp L; Moonen L; van der Poel H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2262-70. PubMed ID: 16121581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computerised prostate boundary estimation of ultrasound images using radial bas-relief method.
    Liu YJ; Ng WS; Teo MY; Lim HC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1997 Sep; 35(5):445-54. PubMed ID: 9374046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image registration accuracy of a 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.
    Guo Y; Werahera PN; Narayanan R; Li L; Kumar D; Crawford ED; Suri JS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1561-8. PubMed ID: 19854971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Segmenting the prostate and rectum in CT imagery using anatomical constraints.
    Chen S; Lovelock DM; Radke RJ
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20634121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Boundary delineation in transrectal ultrasound image for prostate cancer.
    Zhang Y; Sankar R; Qian W
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Nov; 37(11):1591-9. PubMed ID: 17466966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prostate zones in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound.
    Strasser H; Janetschek G; Reissigl A; Bartsch G
    Urology; 1996 Apr; 47(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 8638355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Augmenting detection of prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound images using SVM and RF time series.
    Moradi M; Abolmaesumi P; Siemens DR; Sauerbrei EE; Boag AH; Mousavi P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Sep; 56(9):2214-24. PubMed ID: 19272866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.
    Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Edge detection in prostatic ultrasound images using integrated edge maps.
    Aarnink RG; Pathak SD; de la Rosette JJ; Debruyne FM; Kim Y; Wijkstra H
    Ultrasonics; 1998 Feb; 36(1-5):635-42. PubMed ID: 9651593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.