These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8519054)

  • 1. An in vitro study into the effect of a bacterial artificial caries system on the enamel adjacent to composite and amalgam restorations.
    Gilmour AS; Edmunds DH; Newcombe RG; Clark MF
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8519054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Secondary caries related to various marginal gaps around amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Dérand T; Birkhed D; Edwardsson S
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 1876980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro caries related to marginal leakage around composite resin restorations.
    Eriksen HM; Pears G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Jan; 5(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 272439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Rueggeberg FA; Adair SM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 129(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9448347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental materials for posterior restorations.
    Rykke M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1992 Aug; 8(4):139-48. PubMed ID: 1291301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Caries recurrence at the margin of silver amalgam restorations].
    Poggio C; Lanati C
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Jun; 52(6):49-52. PubMed ID: 6596222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Pulp response to restorative materials].
    Advokaat JG
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1990 Mar; 97(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 2096304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amalgam restoration and in vitro caries formation.
    Grossman ES; Matejka JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 7722937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of root caries restorations.
    Herrin KH; Shen C
    Gerodontics; 1985 Aug; 1(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 3864708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histological features of artificial secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations.
    Grossman ES; Matejka JM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Sep; 26(9):737-44. PubMed ID: 10520149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.