These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8521134)

  • 1. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Steiner MS
    Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient selection for, results of, and impact on tumor resection of potency-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Catalona WJ
    Urol Clin North Am; 1990 Nov; 17(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 2219579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.
    Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Graefen M; Haese A; Pichlmeier U; Hammerer PG; Noldus J; Butz K; Erbersdobler A; Henke RP; Michl U; Fernandez S; Huland H
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):857-63. PubMed ID: 11176486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients.
    Ayyathurai R; Manoharan M; Nieder AM; Kava B; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(7):833-6. PubMed ID: 18190627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ
    Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
    Marien TP; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Wieder JA; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9679867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in sexual function and quality of life after nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Gralnek D; Wessells H; Cui H; Dalkin BL
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1166-9; discussion 1169-70. PubMed ID: 10737488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seminal monolateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
    Bellina M; Mari M; Ambu A; Guercio S; Rolle L; Tampellini M
    Urol Int; 2005; 75(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 16123574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy.
    Walsh PC
    Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Nov; 14(4):663-73. PubMed ID: 3314061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
    Harris MJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.
    Catalona WJ; Carvalhal GF; Mager DE; Smith DS
    J Urol; 1999 Aug; 162(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 10411052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of moderate dose of postoperative radiation on urinary continence and potency in patients with prostate cancer treated with nerve sparing prostatectomy.
    Formenti SC; Lieskovsky G; Simoneau AR; Skinner D; Groshen S; Chen SC; Petrovich Z
    J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):616-9. PubMed ID: 8558674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view.
    Geary ES; Dendinger TE; Freiha FS; Stamey TA
    J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 7776409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.