These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8521323)

  • 1. Surface and internal absorbed doses in mandibular and maxillary occlusal radiography.
    Roth SF; Bohay RN; Barnett RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Nov; 61(11):955-9. PubMed ID: 8521323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device.
    Mah JK; Danforth RA; Bumann A; Hatcher D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 14561979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Red bone marrow doses, integral absorbed doses, and somatically effective dose equivalent from four maxillary occlusal projections.
    Berge TI; Wøhni T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6583630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction of absorbed doses in radiography of the facial skeleton.
    Julin P; Kraepelien T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1113-6. PubMed ID: 6333160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8508935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation in patients during periapical dental radiography].
    Donta-Bakoyianni CN
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1990 Dec; 44(6):403-11. PubMed ID: 2130351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
    Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dose estimation for exposure conditions of diagnostic radiology acquired by a 2011 questionnaire in a phantom study].
    Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi K; Asada Y; Takikawa Y; Yamada M; Suzuki S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1372-8. PubMed ID: 24366557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Organ absorbed doses in intraoral dental radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Nov; 66(791):1035-41. PubMed ID: 8281379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absorbed doses modified by exposure settings with rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 8620589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Low-dose computerized tomography of the jaw bone in pre-implantation diagnosis. Limits of dose reduction and accuracy of distance measurements].
    Hassfeld S; Streib S; Sahl H; Stratmann U; Fehrentz D; Zöller J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 Jul; 2(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 9738367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation during lateral cephalometric radiography].
    Patsakas AJ; Donta CN; Tsiklakis KD
    Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2640655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children.
    Bankvall G; Håkansson HA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 6954429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.