BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8522006)

  • 1. [Comparison of the planimetric and gravimetric methods in the study of the efficiency of endodontic instruments].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Kapolka J; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Apr; 88(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 8522006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In vitro comparison of instruments for root canal preparation. I. Pilot study of the homogeneity of study groups].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Jun; 88(6):199-204. PubMed ID: 8522015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [LASER applications in endodontics].
    De Moor R; Roeykens H; Meire M; Depraet F
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(2):115-45. PubMed ID: 16082880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonic instruments in root canal therapy.
    Waplington M; Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD
    Dent Update; 1995 Oct; 22(8):339-42. PubMed ID: 8948205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices.
    Shen Y; Coil JM; McLean AG; Hemerling DL; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1363-7. PubMed ID: 19801231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of two root canal preparation and obturation methods: the Mc Spadden method and the use of ProFile-Thermafil].
    Rapisarda E; Bonaccorso A; Tripi TR
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999; 48(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 10356949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study.
    Tzanetakis GN; Kontakiotis EG; Maurikou DV; Marzelou MP
    J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):675-8. PubMed ID: 18498887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Unal GC; Kaya BU; Taç AG; Keçeci AD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 19220515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentine removal in the coronal portion of root canals following two preparation techniques.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Falanga A; Di Giuseppe IL; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2007 Nov; 40(11):852-8. PubMed ID: 17697107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [In vitro comparison of instruments used for root canal preparation. II. Effectiveness of the instruments].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Aug; 88(8):261-9. PubMed ID: 8522021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of the canal shaping duration with Pro Taper: 50 cases--clinical experience].
    Leye BF; Gaye NF; Bane K; Mbaye M; Faye B; Touré B; Sarr M; Kane
    Dakar Med; 2008; 53(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 19626795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments: a new concept.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Lwin TT; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):651-6. PubMed ID: 9220749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of nickel titanium instruments for cleaning and shaping root canal systems.
    Himel VT; Levitan ME
    Tex Dent J; 2003 Mar; 120(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 12723109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.