222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8522021)
1. [In vitro comparison of instruments used for root canal preparation. II. Effectiveness of the instruments].
Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1995 Aug; 88(8):261-9. PubMed ID: 8522021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [In vitro comparison of instruments for root canal preparation. III. Study of the instruments from the viewpoint of shaping asymmetry].
Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1995 Oct; 88(10):319-29. PubMed ID: 8521999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [In vitro comparison of instruments for root canal preparation. I. Pilot study of the homogeneity of study groups].
Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1995 Jun; 88(6):199-204. PubMed ID: 8522015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative evaluation of root canal shaping instruments tested on extracted human teeth. I. Comparison of traditional manual instruments and the Kerr-flex filing device].
Dobó NC; Kiss I; Bartha K; Bernåth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1995 Jul; 88(7):225-32. PubMed ID: 8522017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments.
Buchanan LS
Dent Today; 1998 May; 17(5):54-60. PubMed ID: 9796468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Shaping root canals, Part V: GT File technique in small-root canals.
Buchanan LS
Dent Today; 2000 Jan; 19(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 12523241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Shaping root canals, Part 4. GT File technique in large root canals with large apical diameters.
Buchanan LS
Dent Today; 1999 Dec; 18(12):64-6, 68-9. PubMed ID: 10803154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Shaping root canals, Part 3. Large-root canals with small coronal and apical diameters.
Buchanan LS
Dent Today; 1999 Nov; 18(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 10803164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The feel of steel, Part 2: Getting to the point.
Rozen J
Dent Today; 1998 Jun; 17(6):56-8, 60-1. PubMed ID: 9796451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the apical transportation of root canals using the method of the curvature radius.
Lopes HP; Elias CN; Estrela C; Siqueira JF
Braz Dent J; 1998; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 9835803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [In vitro comparative study of instruments for root canal preparation. IV. Correlations between the original shape of the root canal and the asymmetry resulting from the preparation].
Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1996 Jan; 89(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 8713616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
Schäfer E; Lau R
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 10530244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root canals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments.
Zelada G; Varela P; Martín B; Bahíllo JG; Magán F; Ahn S
J Endod; 2002 Jul; 28(7):540-2. PubMed ID: 12126386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endodontic anatomy of the root canals of lower incisors.
Artal N; Gani O
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2000; 13(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 11885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments.
Buchanan LS
Dent Today; 1999 Feb; 18(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 10765815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth.
Kielbassa AM; Muller U; Munz I; Monting JS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jan; 95(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 12539034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
