329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8522716)
21. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bipolar transvenous defibrillation: efficacy of two different positions of the anode.
Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Castrucci M; Fastenrath C; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 8552512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Additional lead improves defibrillation efficacy with an abdominal 'hot can' electrode system.
Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Niebauer MJ; Tchou PJ; Wilkoff BL
Circulation; 1997 Dec; 96(12):4400-7. PubMed ID: 9416910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transvenous defibrillation leads: is there an ideal position of the defibrillation anode?
Trappe HJ; Pfitzner P; Fain E; Dresler C; Fieguth HG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Apr; 20(4 Pt 1):880-92. PubMed ID: 9127392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of a single element subcutaneous array electrode added to a transvenous electrode configuration on the defibrillation field and the defibrillation threshold.
Kühlkamp V; Dörnberger V; Khalighi K; Mewis C; Suchalla R; Ziemer G; Seipel L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12):2596-605. PubMed ID: 9894650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Successful implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator systems in patients with elevated defibrillation thresholds.
Brooks R; Torchiana D; Vlahakes GJ; Ruskin JN; McGovern BA; Garan H
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Aug; 22(2):569-74. PubMed ID: 8335831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The left subclavian vein as an alternative site for implantation of the second defibrillation lead.
Markewitz A; Kaulbach H; Mattke S; Dorwarth U; Hoffmann E; Weinhold C; Steinbeck G; Reichart B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Mar; 18(3 Pt 1):401-5. PubMed ID: 7770359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Achieving low defibrillation thresholds at implant: pharmacological influences, RV coil polarity and position, SVC coil usage and positioning, pulse width settings, and the azygous vein.
Kroll MW; Schwab JO
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):561-73. PubMed ID: 20608994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of malpositioned transvenous leads on defibrillation efficacy with and without a subcutaneous array electrode.
Usui M; Walcott GP; KenKnight BH; Walker RG; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):2008-16. PubMed ID: 8552514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation.
Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Dahl RW; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 3(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10490479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system.
Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Horwood LE; Jentzer J; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Kou W
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(4):1069-72. PubMed ID: 7930199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans.
Marks ML; Johnson G; Hofer BO; Bardy GH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Defibrillator implantation in a patient with a persistent left superior vena cava.
Mattke S; Markewitz A; Dorwarth U; Hoffmann E; Steinbeck G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):117-20. PubMed ID: 7700825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Acute defibrillation performance of a novel, non-transvenous shock pathway in adult ICD indicated patients.
Lieberman R; Havel WJ; Rashba E; DeGroot PJ; Stromberg K; Shorofsky SR
Heart Rhythm; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 18053770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads: effect of transvenous electrode polarity on defibrillation threshold.
Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Isbruch F; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 5(11):912-8. PubMed ID: 7889231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Azygous vein coil lowers defibrillation threshold in patients with high defibrillation threshold.
Seow SC; Tolentino CS; Zhao J; Lim TW
Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):825-8. PubMed ID: 21436136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can.
Swerdlow CD; Davie S; Kass RM; Chen PS; Hwang C; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Raissi S; Peter CT
Am J Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 76(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 7639162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
