These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 852314)

  • 1. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: economic considerations.
    Gad C; Ostergaard E
    Dan Med Bull; 1977 Apr; 24(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 852314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: the influence of population screening on mortality.
    Gad C
    Dan Med Bull; 1976 Dec; 23(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 1009799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: the influence of population screening on incidence and stage distribution of invasive cases.
    Gad C
    Dan Med Bull; 1976 May; 23(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 949913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in the Borough of Frederiksberg.
    Koch F; Stakemann G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1967; 46():Suppl 9:77-84. PubMed ID: 6075717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
    Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
    Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Status of preventive examinations against uterine cervix cancer in Denmark].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jespersen NB; Lindsø R; Olesen F; Poll P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1339-42. PubMed ID: 1598707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epithelial dysplasia of the cervix uteri. The population screening for cervical carcinoma in the County of Maribo, 1967-69.
    Berget A
    Dan Med Bull; 1974 Aug; 21(5):169-71. PubMed ID: 4851895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Early screening for cervical carcinoma within primary prevention].
    Derese A; Geldhof A; Vuylsteek K
    Arch Belg; 1982; 40(9-10):381-416. PubMed ID: 7185335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cost-benefit analysis of proposals for mass examination for cancer of the cervix].
    Kamper-Jorgensen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1972 Jun; 134(23):1239-43. PubMed ID: 5047539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Costs and effects of alternative screening programs against cervical cancer].
    Gyrd-Hansen D; Hølund B; Andersen P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Aug; 158(35):4912-5. PubMed ID: 8801698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in the country of Frederiksborg. Preliminary evaluation of a centrally controlled system adapted to a selected age group].
    Larsen E; Hou-Jensen K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1555-7. PubMed ID: 1145870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [3d mass screening for cervix carcinoma in the testing area].
    Lammes FB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Mar; 132(11):479-80. PubMed ID: 3357553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Health examination in Malmöhus County for the diagnosis of pre-invasive cervical cancer].
    Ahlgren M; Lindberg LG; Nordqvist S; Stormby N
    Lakartidningen; 1971 Jun; 68(30):3389-97. PubMed ID: 5096169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
    Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
    Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Critique of cytology as a mass-screening method].
    Pflanz M
    Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):351-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4819501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical breast examination as a supplement to mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Bostofte E; Berg O; Serup J
    Dan Med Bull; 1981 Aug; 28(3):100-2. PubMed ID: 7273864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cervical cancer in Frederiksborg County 1990-1991].
    Ingeholm P; Glenthøj A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(7):915-8. PubMed ID: 8638329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.