These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients. Kent KC; Kuntz KM; Patel MR; Kim D; Klufas RA; Whittemore AD; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Edelman RR JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):888-93. PubMed ID: 7674503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting. Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Role of 0.5 T magnetic resonance and duplex ultrasonography in the imaging of stenotic and oblitertive changes in the carotid arteries]. Hebrang A; Brinar V; Vidjak V; Grga A; Sarlija M; Sosa T; Tomac S; Drasković J Lijec Vjesn; 2002 May; 124(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 12152411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical decision making for carotid endarterectomy and contemporary magnetic resonance angiography. Ozaki CK; Irwin PB; Flynn TC; Huber TS; Seeger JM Am J Surg; 1999 Sep; 178(3):182-4. PubMed ID: 10527434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital. Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates. Turnipseed WD; Kennell TW; Turski PA; Acher CW; Hoch JR Surgery; 1993 Oct; 114(4):643-8; discussion 648-9. PubMed ID: 8211677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blinded-reader comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. Mittl RL; Broderick M; Carpenter JP; Goldberg HI; Listerud J; Mishkin MM; Berkowitz HD; Atlas SW Stroke; 1994 Jan; 25(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 8266380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography. Jackson MR; Chang AS; Robles HA; Gillespie DL; Olsen SB; Kaiser WJ; Goff JM; O'Donnell SD; Rich NM Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 9588509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis. D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandatory diagnostic angiography for carotid artery stenosis prior to carotid artery intervention. Makaryus AN; Phillips LM; Wright P; Freeman J; Green SJ; Ong L; Marchant D J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Feb; 22(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18973511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quantitative assessment of carotid stenosis: comparison between Doppler ultrasound, spiral computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography]. Tiev KP; Sevestre MA; Reix T; Auquier M; Cabane J; Dehouck B; Jounaville F; Idy Perretti I; Sentou Y; Remond A; Pietri J J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):325-331. PubMed ID: 11148393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients. Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]