These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8524523)

  • 21. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography.
    Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intrapartum prediction of fetal status and assessment of labour progress.
    Hamilton E; Kimanani EK
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Sep; 8(3):567-81. PubMed ID: 7813129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part II)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 18510096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part III)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 18592859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part I)].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 18510054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Combined monitoring of labor: maternal and neonatal results].
    Goeschen K
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 1496843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part I). Too short monitoring].
    Markwitz W; Ropacka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Apr; 79(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 18592871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Sinusoidal heart rate].
    Halberstadt E; Born HJ; Schroyens E
    Gynakologe; 1994 Jun; 27(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 7926958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The added predictive value of biphasic events in ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Becker JH; Krikhaar A; Schuit E; Mårtendal A; Maršál K; Kwee A; Visser GH; Amer-Wåhlin I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Feb; 94(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 25421390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes].
    Liu W; Li X; Tang D
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of STAN S21 fetal heart monitor by medical staff.
    Rault S; Vayssiere C; Roth E; David E; Favre R; Langer B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 102(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 18378238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predictability of intrapartum cardiotocography with meconium stained liquor and its correlation with perinatal outcome.
    Husain A; Naseem A; Anjum S; Imran S; Arifuzzaman M; Adil SO
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Jul; 68(7):1014-1018. PubMed ID: 30317293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spontaneous fetal heart rate deceleration: an ominous sign for fetal outcome.
    Chuang J; Chou CT; Cheng WC; Huang LW; Hwang JL; Tsai YL
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 May; 269(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 12898142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Usefulness of the pulse oximetry in diagnosis of fetal distress during labor].
    Tomala J; Sikora J; Chromy G; Kobielska L; Machalski T; Magnucki J; Kiecka M
    Ginekol Pol; 2000 Aug; 71(8):941-5. PubMed ID: 11082953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.
    Puertas A; Góngora J; Valverde M; Revelles L; Manzanares S; Carrillo MP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():213-217. PubMed ID: 30731334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Admission cardiotocography: a randomised controlled trial.
    Impey L; Reynolds M; MacQuillan K; Gates S; Murphy J; Sheil O
    Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9356):465-70. PubMed ID: 12583945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
    Pinas A; Chandraharan E
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Gandhi H; Kean L
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2008 Jul; 69(7):388-91. PubMed ID: 18833968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.