These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8525866)

  • 1. Overlapping stage models and reaction time additivity: effects of the activation equation.
    Miller J; van der Ham F; Sanders AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):11-28. PubMed ID: 8525866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The exhaustive additivity displayed by nitrous oxide has implications for cognitive-energetical theory.
    Fowler B; Hofer K; Lipitkas J
    Biol Psychol; 2000 Mar; 52(2):161-80. PubMed ID: 10699354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A queue-series model for reaction time, with discrete-stage and continuous-flow models as special cases.
    Miller J
    Psychol Rev; 1993 Oct; 100(4):702-15. PubMed ID: 8255954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stochastic cascade processes as a model of multi-stage concurrent information processing.
    Schwarz W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jul; 113(3):231-61. PubMed ID: 12834998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-stage model for order discrimination.
    Jaśkowski P
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 1881768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative importance of perceptual and memory sampling processes in determining the time course of absolute identification.
    Guest D; Kent C; Adelman JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):615-630. PubMed ID: 28967762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exhaustive additivity suggests a new stage not an alternative model: A commentary on Fowler, Hofer and Lipitkas (2000).
    Smulders FT; van der Molen MW
    Biol Psychol; 2001 Feb; 55(3):227-31; discussion 233-7. PubMed ID: 11240217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are there limits to binaural additivity of loudness?
    Gigerenzer G; Strube G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Feb; 9(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 6220118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time course of selective visual attention: theory and experiments.
    Deco G; Pollatos O; Zihl J
    Vision Res; 2002 Dec; 42(27):2925-45. PubMed ID: 12450503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures.
    Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1739-59. PubMed ID: 19933559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two experiments on the temporal boundaries for the nonlinear additivity of masking.
    Cokely CG; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2553-9. PubMed ID: 8270733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability inequalities for testing separate activation models of divided attention.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Dec; 52(6):714-6. PubMed ID: 1287576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The overconstraint of response time models: rethinking the scaling problem.
    Donkin C; Brown SD; Heathcote A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19966267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task modulation of the effects of brightness on reaction time and response force.
    Jaśkowski P; Włodarczyk D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16198013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: a test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model.
    Mewhort DJ; Braun JG; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):872-82. PubMed ID: 1500881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Eriksen CW
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 3405746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.
    Kornblum S; Hasbroucq T; Osman A
    Psychol Rev; 1990 Apr; 97(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 2186425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clarification of self-terminating versus exhaustive variances in serial and parallel models.
    Townsend JT
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):1101-6. PubMed ID: 11578054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrete finger response latencies in a simple reaction time task.
    Adam JJ; Van Veggel LM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):863-6. PubMed ID: 1792134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.