These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8527752)

  • 21. [Digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the conventional film-screen technique in diagnosis of fractures].
    Fink U; Schwerdtfeger J; Fink BK; Schätzl M; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8645859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Sommer A; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [X-ray studies of the peripheral joints: a comparison of digital luminescence radiography (DLR) and film-screen systems].
    Krug B; Fischbach R; Herrmann S; Dietlein M; Küpper T; Dölken W; Harnischmacher U
    Rofo; 1993 Feb; 158(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 8443358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computed vs. film-screen magnification radiography of fingers in hyperparathyroidism. An ROC analysis.
    Jónsson A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Andersen R; Pettersson H
    Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 7742125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic].
    Dölken W; Chowanetz W; Horwitz AE; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Digital luminescence and conventional radiography in laryngeal and pharyngeal diagnosis].
    Malms J; Bier H
    Radiologe; 1991 Aug; 31(8):388-93. PubMed ID: 1947054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Lung imaging in intensive medicine. A comparison of digital storage-screen imaging and conventional film-screen imaging].
    Busch HP; Winter-Nossek A; Bethke U; Kohler P; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 2160100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of digital radiography using stimulable phosphor for diagnosis of pneumothorax.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A
    Acta Radiol; 1990 Jan; 31(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2187511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography during excretory urography: our experience.
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 2085269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The potentials of digital image-intensifier radiography exemplified by digital spot imaging (DSI)].
    Rückforth J; Wein B; Stargardt A; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 7579216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [ROC comparison of visualization of hand fractures using digital and conventional techniques].
    Hofstetter H; Voegeli E
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 9376556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Colonic contrast enema in digital luminescent radiography (DLR) and conventional x-ray technic].
    Krug B; Steinbrich W; Lorenz R; Glathe S; Dietlein M; Schirrmeister J
    Rofo; 1990 Feb; 152(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 2155442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Agreement and reading time for differently-priced devices for the digital capture of X-ray films.
    Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
    J Telemed Telecare; 2012 Mar; 18(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 22169230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. An ROC analysis.
    Jónsson A; Borg A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Sloth M; Petterson H
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8011377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.
    Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.
    Roohi Shalemaei R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):220-2. PubMed ID: 21764806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Traditional and digital urography compared. The authors' own experience].
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Radiol Med; 1990 Apr; 79(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 2377752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.
    Nol J; Isouard G; Mirecki J
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Clinical and technical experiences with digital luminescent radiography in phlebography of the leg].
    Schwermer B; Witte G; Nicolas V; Bücheler E
    Rofo; 1990 Feb; 152(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 2155447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.