56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8530171)
1. Identification of axons in the peri-implant region by immunohistochemistry.
Weiner S; Klein M; Doyle JL; Brunner M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):689-95. PubMed ID: 8530171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. part 4: a histologic study in monkeys.
Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Ohto T; Shin K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 12074454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of allogeneic, freeze-dried, demineralized bone matrix on guided bone regeneration in supra-alveolar peri-implant defects in dogs.
Caplanis N; Sigurdsson TJ; Rohrer MD; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 9337024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensory responses from loading of implants: a pilot study.
Weiner S; Sirois D; Ehrenberg D; Lehrmann N; Simon B; Zohn H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 14982354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue: a histologic study in monkeys.
Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Motomura Y; Shin K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 9796152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study on hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants used as orthodontic anchorage--an experimental investigation of implant stability and peri-implant neck tissue in dogs.
Liang X; Tang SQ; Lu D; Zhao ZH; Chao YL; Wang H
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Sep; 1(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 10557196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons.
Watzak G; Zechner W; Ulm C; Tangl S; Tepper G; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 16117764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subcrestal placement of two-part implants.
Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 19397633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of loading on the development of nerve fibers around oral implants in the dog mandible.
Wada S; Kojo T; Wang YH; Ando H; Nakanishi E; Zhang M; Fukuyama H; Uchida Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 11359478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft tissue around three different implant types after 1.5 years of functional loading without oral hygiene: a preliminary study in baboons.
Watzak G; Zechner W; Tangl S; Vasak C; Donath K; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 16584420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peri-implant hard and soft tissue integration to dental implants made of titanium and gold.
Abrahamsson I; Cardaropoli G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 17298489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Todescan FF; Pustiglioni FE; Imbronito AV; Albrektsson T; Gioso M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 12182289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
