155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8530709)
1. Stabilization of the short sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro testing of different plate and screw configurations.
Hammer B; Ettlin D; Rahn B; Prein J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Oct; 23(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 8530709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws.
Shetty V; Freymiller E; McBrearty D; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Nov; 54(11):1317-24; discussion 1324-6. PubMed ID: 8941183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Foley WL; Beckman TW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 1291608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Altuncu F; Kazan D; Özden B
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Nov; 28(6):e553-e561. PubMed ID: 37823299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro strength analysis of sagittal split osteotomy fixation: noncompression monocortical plates versus bicortical position screws.
Anucul B; Waite PD; Lemons JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Dec; 50(12):1295-9. PubMed ID: 1447609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate.
Pereira Filho VA; Iamashita HY; Monnazzi MS; Gabrielli MF; Vaz LG; Passeri LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 22898312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of inferior alveolar disturbance restoration after sagittal split osteotomy by means of bicortical versus monocortical osteosynthesis.
Fujioka M; Hirano A; Fujii T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Jul; 102(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9655405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Stability of screw fixation following sagittal splitting osteotomy of the mandibular ramus].
Eba M
Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990; 19(3):356-76. PubMed ID: 2134896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal stability following sagittal split osteotomy using monocortical miniplate internal fixation.
Rubens BC; Stoelinga PJ; Blijdorp PA; Schoenaers JH; Politis C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Dec; 17(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 3145953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are bicortical screw and plate osteosynthesis techniques equal in providing skeletal stability with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy when used for mandibular advancement surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Moraissi EA; Al-Hendi EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1195-200. PubMed ID: 27185389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy: a comparison of lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique.
Becktor JP; Rebellato J; Sollenius O; Vedtofte P; Isaksson S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 18083423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
