155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8530709)
41. Stability of bicortical screw versus plate fixation after mandibular setback with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26474933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. In vitro comparison of fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy with a major advancement and counterclockwise rotation.
Geçkil N; Can Tukel H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 60(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 35065834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Does Intraoral Miniplate Fixation Have Good Postoperative Stability After Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy? Comparison With Intraoral Bicortical Screw Fixation.
Matsushita Y; Nakakuki K; Kosugi M; Kurohara K; Harada K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 74(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 26117377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The sagittal ramus osteotomy. Stability of fixation with internal miniplates.
Lee J; Piecuch JF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Dec; 21(6):326-30. PubMed ID: 1484198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Principle and stability of locking plates.
Gutwald R; Alpert B; Schmelzeisen R
Keio J Med; 2003 Mar; 52(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12713018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Takahashi H; Moriyama S; Furuta H; Matsunaga H; Sakamoto Y; Kikuta T
Head Face Med; 2010 Mar; 6():4. PubMed ID: 20346142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in monkeys: a comparison of monocortical and bicortical fixation.
Hu J; Zhao Q; Tang J; Zheng Z; Qi MC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 45(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17027127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Skeletal stability following miniplate fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Neyt L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 51(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 8450352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.
De Oliveira LB; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Oguz Y; Pereira-Filho VA
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 54(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 27068853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Neurosensory deficit following mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: A comparative study between positional screws and miniplates fixation.
Yeo XH; Ayoub A; Lee C; Byrne N; Currie WRJ
Surgeon; 2017 Oct; 15(5):278-281. PubMed ID: 27522455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An in vitro study of the effect of bony buttressing on fixation strength of a fractured atrophic edentulous mandible model.
Sikes JW; Smith BR; Mukherjee DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 58(1):56-61; discussion 62. PubMed ID: 10632166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Photoelastic analysis of internal screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Kim HC; Essaki S; Kameyama T; Yamamoto K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1993 Sep; 21(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 8227377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.
Chang LR; Chen CC; Jeng SF; Chen YR; Hwang LC; Lin TS
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8707389. PubMed ID: 32685538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative evaluation of two osteosynthesis methods on stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Maurer P; Knoll WD; Schubert J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 31(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 14563328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. In vitro study of a modified sagittal split osteotomy fixation technique of the mandible: a mechanical test.
Sonego CL; Scheffer MAR; Chagas Júnior OL; Vetromilla BM; Fernandes LP; Ozkomur A; Silva Júnior AN; Miguens Júnior SAQ; Hernandez PAG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 29655819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of rigid fixation on orthodontic finishing after mandibular bilateral sagittal split setback: the case for miniplate monocortical fixation.
Cho HJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e310-21. PubMed ID: 22197006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. How effective is a thick plate on stabilisation in 10 mm mandibular advancement?
Esen A; Menziletoglu D; Aybüke Erdur E; Akkulah S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jul; 60(6):803-809. PubMed ID: 35437194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
