155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8530709)
61. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases.
Edwards RC; Kiely KD; Eppley BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11243608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Resistance and Stress Finite Element Analysis of Different Types of Fixation for Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery.
Stringhini DJ; Sommerfeld R; Uetanabaro LC; Leonardi DP; Araújo MR; Rebellato NL; Costa DJ; Scariot R
Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 27224561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Evaluation of intersegmental displacement according to osteosynthesis method for mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition.
Kim YI; Park SB; Jung YH; Hwang DS; Lee JY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2893-8. PubMed ID: 22726704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The need for intermaxillary fixation in sagittal split osteotomy setbacks with bicortical screw fixation.
Choi BH; Zhu SJ; Han SG; Huh JY; Kim BY; Jung JH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Sep; 100(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 16122655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Post-BSSO condylar position stability: a comparison of miniplate and lag screw fixation.
Aliabadi E; Eskandari F; Zanjani M; Babouei M
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):728. PubMed ID: 38918762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yamashita Y; Otsuka T; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 21185151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation.
Yamashita Y; Mizuashi K; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 17150332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy among mono-cortical plate fixation, bi-cortical plate fixation, and hybrid fixation using absorbable plates and screws.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Yoshizawa K; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):178-182. PubMed ID: 28011183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.
Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Bicortical-monocortical fixation of the sagittal mandibular osteotomy.
Schwartz HC; Relle RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Feb; 54(2):234-5. PubMed ID: 8604080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.
Politi M; Costa F; Cian R; Polini F; Robiony M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 62(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 14762749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Effect of number and geometry of resorbable screws on biomechanical stability of in vitro model with sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Hwang JM; Baek SH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 22421826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. A comparison of the stability of miniplate with bicortical screw fixation after sagittal split setback.
Choi BH; Min YS; Yi CK; Lee WY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):416-9. PubMed ID: 11027376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Osteosynthesis after sagittal division of the mandible. Biomechanical stability of various methods in a pig mandibular model].
Pistner H; Reuther JF; Ordung R; Bill J; Voges I
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1997 Jul; 1(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 9410629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Caldas RA; Goulart DR; Hemerson de Moraes P; Olate S; Ricardo Barão VA; Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 30718216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review.
Joss CU; Vassalli IM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 19138603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
