These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8530726)

  • 1. Radiographic detection of overhangs formed by resin composite luting agents.
    O'Rourke B; Walls AW; Wassell RW
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):353-7. PubMed ID: 8530726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiopacity of posterior composite resins, composite resin luting cements, and glass ionomer lining cements.
    Akerboom HB; Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Mol A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Oct; 70(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8229888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimum radiopacity of composite inlay materials and cements.
    Goshima T; Goshima Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1923406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro analysis of the radiodensity of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Fonseca RB; Martins LR; Neto FH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Dec; 11(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17598135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay.
    Schmalz G; Federlin M; Reich E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 7783020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Inokoshi S; Willems G; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):329-38. PubMed ID: 8530722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent Res; 1992 Nov; 71(11):1842-6. PubMed ID: 1401449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiopacity of resin-based inlay luting cements.
    el-Mowafy OM; Benmergui C
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 8183726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo.
    Van Meerbeek B; Inokoshi S; Willems G; Noack MJ; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Roulet JF; Vanherle G
    J Dent; 1992 Feb; 20(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 1548381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Marginal behavior of "Kulzer" composite inlays under simultaneous mechanical and thermal loading].
    Hannig M; Rahlf B; Schlichting B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):618-20. PubMed ID: 1817945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements. An in vitro study.
    Sjögren G; Hedlund SO
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Dec; 55(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 9477035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 8990682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Katoh Y
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):767-71. PubMed ID: 7568681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic assessments of Class II resin composite inlays.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Akerboom HB; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 8089348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.