These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8531164)

  • 21. [Mechanical studies on dental magnetic attachments].
    Ishikawa S
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Mar; 60(1):98-120. PubMed ID: 8482913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Retention of Pt-Co magnet for dental prosthesis].
    Okuno O; Nakano T; Hamanaka H; Kinouchi Y
    Tokyo Ika Shika Daigaku Iyo Kizai Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1989; 23():1-5. PubMed ID: 2488956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Development and transition of magnetic attachments--a literature review].
    Hirata M
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Dec; 64(4):544-56. PubMed ID: 9483897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of burn-out temperature on magnetic keepers in cast noble metal alloy posts.
    Pow EH; Chan KH; Luk HW; Dias AP; McMillan AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19105993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro effect of microwave irradiation on the retentive force of magnets.
    Lemon JC; Brignoni RA; Collard SM; Martin JW; Powers JM; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 15116039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Sandwich type dental magnetic devices of Nd-Fe-B magnet and permendur].
    Okuno O; Nakano T; Hamanaka H; Kinouchi Y
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Jul; 8(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 2491164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.
    Ceruti P; Bryant SR; Lee JH; MacEntee MI
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a52. PubMed ID: 20943036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink Locator attachments: an in vitro study.
    Nguyen CT; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20040032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between the force and separation of miniature magnets used in dentistry.
    Darvell BW; Gilding BH
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jun; 34(6):e89-e106. PubMed ID: 29673710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdenture attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16501313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink locator attachments after multiple pulls: an in vitro study.
    You W; Masri R; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; You T
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 21777332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of the number and the type of magnetic attachment on the retention of mandibular mini implant overdenture.
    Lee E; Shin SY
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 28243387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.