These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8531304)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening.
    Boer R; van Oortmarssen GJ; de Koning HJ
    JAMA; 1996 Jan; 275(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 8531304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening.
    Black WC; Tosteson AN
    JAMA; 1996 Jan; 275(2):111; author reply 112. PubMed ID: 8531302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening.
    Donnelly PD; Lo SV
    JAMA; 1996 Jan; 275(2):111; author reply 112. PubMed ID: 8531303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.
    Skrabanek P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):633-5. PubMed ID: 1778706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of mammography for older women.
    Finucane TE
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 May; 140(10):844; author reply 844. PubMed ID: 15148077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
    Iinuma T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Summaries for patients. The cost-effectiveness of mammography in women older than 65 years of age.
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 139(10):I34. PubMed ID: 14623641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-benefit determinations in screening mammography.
    Moskowitz M
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1680-3. PubMed ID: 3115556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Breast cancer screening lacks effectiveness].
    Merkelbach JW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jan; 146(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 11826675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Where is free preventive mammography?].
    Gericke D
    Fortschr Med; 1989 Mar; 107(7):16-7. PubMed ID: 2496014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling.
    Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic screening: does it work?
    Handler S
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec; 86(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 14719608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
    Thomas P
    Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
    Cederblom S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of modern screening mammography programmes.
    Bulliard JL
    Evid Based Med; 2014 Apr; 19(2):80. PubMed ID: 24065863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening mammography for women under 50: considerations for fully informed decision making.
    Ernster VL
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):257-60; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Begg CB
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):540-1; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting calculations aside.
    Meyer CR
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec; 86(12):2. PubMed ID: 14719607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary on "Mammography screening: prospects and opportunity costs".
    Mettlin C
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):251-5; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.